From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC25D7D04D for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729283AbfCYQph (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:45:37 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:43266 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726024AbfCYQph (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:45:37 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24F2E9B1; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:45:35 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Joe Perches Cc: Sean Christopherson , Andy Whitcroft , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Tobin C . Harding" , Thomas Gleixner , Jani Nikula , Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz , Jonathan Cameron , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Niklas Cassel Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] docs: Clarify the usage and sign-off requirements for Co-developed-by Message-ID: <20190325104535.5d98c4ed@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <65a633806b819c3067972853a9f1c2b6029e0ce5.camel@perches.com> References: <20190322211137.18241-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20190322211137.18241-2-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20190325103114.2df3b91d@lwn.net> <65a633806b819c3067972853a9f1c2b6029e0ce5.camel@perches.com> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:40:32 -0700 Joe Perches wrote: > > I've applied this. Joe, do you want to handle the checkpatch.pl patch, or > > would you prefer I take that one too? > > You taking it is fine with me. > OK, I've now done that, thanks. jon