From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6265B7D2EF for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 22:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726395AbfE2WfM (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 18:35:12 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:43888 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726018AbfE2WfM (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 18:35:12 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E53482B4; Wed, 29 May 2019 22:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 16:35:10 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Changbin Du Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] Include linux PCI docs into Sphinx TOC tree Message-ID: <20190529163510.3dd4dc2d@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20190520061014.qtq6tc366pnnqcio@mail.google.com> References: <20190514144734.19760-1-changbin.du@gmail.com> <20190520061014.qtq6tc366pnnqcio@mail.google.com> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 May 2019 06:10:15 +0000 Changbin Du wrote: > Bjorn and Jonathan, > Could we consider to merge this serias now? Thanks. Somewhat belatedly, but I think we could. Bjorn, do you have a preference for which tree this goes through? I don't remember if we'd come to an agreement on that or not, sorry... Thanks, jon