From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C807D2EF for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 19:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729640AbfFGTaW (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2019 15:30:22 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:58516 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729172AbfFGTaW (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2019 15:30:22 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A6D82CD; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 19:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 13:30:21 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Shiyang Ruan , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: xfs: Fix typo Message-ID: <20190607133021.3a537e3a@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20190607183410.GF1871505@magnolia> References: <20190509030549.2253-1-ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20190607114415.32cb32dd@lwn.net> <20190607183410.GF1871505@magnolia> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 11:34:10 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" wrote: > I doubt the value of maintaining duplicate copies of this document in > the kernel and the xfs documentation repo, and since the xfs docs and > kernel licences aren't compatible maybe we should withdraw one... Um .... the in-kernel docs say nothing about an incompatible license. I see only a GPL license at the repo you pointed to as well. Is there something I don't know going on here? If the licenses aren't compatible then those files shouldn't be there. Thanks, jon