From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9DC7D2EF for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726157AbfFZP2T (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:28:19 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:40304 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726029AbfFZP2T (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:28:19 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE76C4BF; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:28:17 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: On Nitrokey Pro's ECC support Message-ID: <20190626092817.3e5343e6@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20190626152138.GA28688@chatter.i7.local> References: <20190626082541.2cd5897c@lwn.net> <20190626152138.GA28688@chatter.i7.local> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:21:38 -0400 Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > >Maybe Konstantin (copied) might be willing to supply an update to the > >document to reflect this? > > Hello: > > I just sent a patch with updates that reflect ECC capabilities in newer > devices. Hey, man, that took you just under an hour to get done. We can't all just wait around while you twiddle your thumbs... :) Seriously, though, thanks for doing this, jon