From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7F97D2F0 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732511AbfGWNmU (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:42:20 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:48708 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726785AbfGWNmU (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:42:20 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C22D2C9; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:42:18 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Sheriff Esseson Cc: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: filesystem: fix "Removed Sysctls" table Message-ID: <20190723074218.4532737f@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20190723114813.GA14870@localhost> References: <20190723114813.GA14870@localhost> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:48:13 +0100 Sheriff Esseson wrote: > the "Removed Sysctls" section is a table - bring it alive with ReST. > > Signed-off-by: Sheriff Esseson So this appears to be identical to the patch you sent three days ago; is there a reason why you are sending it again now? Thanks, jon