From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258827D2F0 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 22:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389636AbfGWWug (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 18:50:36 -0400 Received: from mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.249]:47339 "EHLO mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732011AbfGWWug (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 18:50:36 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1662 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 18:50:35 EDT Received: from dread.disaster.area (pa49-195-139-63.pa.nsw.optusnet.com.au [49.195.139.63]) by mail105.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B095A2AD85A; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:22:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: from dave by dread.disaster.area with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hq3AE-0003mj-Ey; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:21:42 +1000 Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:21:42 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Sheriff Esseson Cc: Jonathan Corbet , "Darrick J. Wong" , "supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM" , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , open list , skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: filesystem: fix "Removed Sysctls" table Message-ID: <20190723222142.GS7689@dread.disaster.area> References: <20190723114813.GA14870@localhost> <20190723074218.4532737f@lwn.net> <20190723145201.GA20658@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190723145201.GA20658@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=P6RKvmIu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 cx=a_idp_d a=fNT+DnnR6FjB+3sUuX8HHA==:117 a=fNT+DnnR6FjB+3sUuX8HHA==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=0o9FgrsRnhwA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=7-415B0cAAAA:8 a=rzqIo9VfzmB4bOlvi8MA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=igBNqPyMv6gA:10 a=biEYGPWJfzWAr4FL6Ov7:22 Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 03:52:01PM +0100, Sheriff Esseson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:42:18AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:48:13 +0100 > > Sheriff Esseson wrote: > > > > > the "Removed Sysctls" section is a table - bring it alive with ReST. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sheriff Esseson > > > > So this appears to be identical to the patch you sent three days ago; is > > there a reason why you are sending it again now? > > > > Thanks, > > > > jon > > Sorry, I was think the patch went unnoticed during the merge window - I could > not find a response. The correct thing to do in that case is to reply to the original patch and ask if it has been looked at. The usual way of doing this is quoting the commit message and replying with a "Ping?" comment to bump it back to the top of everyone's mail stacks. But, again, 3 days is not a long time, people tend to be extremely busy and might take a few days to get to reviewing non-critical changes, and people may not even review patches during the merge window. I'd suggest waiting a week before pinging a patch you've sent if there's been no response.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com