public inbox for linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: NitinGote <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>
Cc: joe@perches.com, corbet@lwn.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	apw@canonical.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Documentation/checkpatch: Prefer stracpy over strcpy/strlcpy/strncpy.
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:50:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201907251149.B7FD8631@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190725112219.6244-1-nitin.r.gote@intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 04:52:19PM +0530, NitinGote wrote:
> From: Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>
> 
> Added check in checkpatch.pl to deprecate strcpy(), strlcpy() and
> strncpy() in favor of stracpy().

stracpy() is preferred when the destination is a char array (rather than
a string pointer), so that likely needs to be clarified.

-Kees

> 
> Updated Documentation/process/deprecated.rst for stracpy().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>
> ---
>  Change log:
>  v5->v6
>  - Used stracpy() instead of strscpy().
> 
>  v4->v5
>  - Change the subject line as per review comment.
>  - v5 is Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> 
>  v3->v4
>  - Removed "c:func:" from deprecated.rst as per review comment.
> 
>  v2->v3
>  - Avoided use of $check in implementation.
>  - Incorporated trivial comments.
> 
>  v1->v2
>  - For string related apis, created different %deprecated_string_api
>    and these will get emitted at CHECK Level using command line option
>    -f/--file to avoid bad patched from novice script users.
> 
>  Documentation/process/deprecated.rst | 10 +++++-----
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl                | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> index 49e0f64a3427..709662c71a1a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ buffer. This could result in linear overflows beyond the
>  end of the buffer, leading to all kinds of misbehaviors. While
>  `CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y` and various compiler flags help reduce the
>  risk of using this function, there is no good reason to add new uses of
> -this function. The safe replacement is :c:func:`strscpy`.
> +this function. The safe replacement is stracpy().
> 
>  strncpy() on NUL-terminated strings
>  -----------------------------------
> @@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ will be NUL terminated. This can lead to various linear read overflows
>  and other misbehavior due to the missing termination. It also NUL-pads the
>  destination buffer if the source contents are shorter than the destination
>  buffer size, which may be a needless performance penalty for callers using
> -only NUL-terminated strings. The safe replacement is :c:func:`strscpy`.
> -(Users of :c:func:`strscpy` still needing NUL-padding will need an
> -explicit :c:func:`memset` added.)
> +only NUL-terminated strings. In this case, the safe replacement is
> +stracpy(). If, however, the destination buffer still needs NUL-padding,
> +the safe replacement is stracpy_pad().
> 
>  If a caller is using non-NUL-terminated strings, :c:func:`strncpy()` can
>  still be used, but destinations should be marked with the `__nonstring
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ strlcpy()
>  :c:func:`strlcpy` reads the entire source buffer first, possibly exceeding
>  the given limit of bytes to copy. This is inefficient and can lead to
>  linear read overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated. The
> -safe replacement is :c:func:`strscpy`.
> +safe replacement is stracpy().
> 
>  Variable Length Arrays (VLAs)
>  -----------------------------
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 342c7c781ba5..dddf5adf1aac 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -605,6 +605,20 @@ foreach my $entry (keys %deprecated_apis) {
>  }
>  $deprecated_apis_search = "(?:${deprecated_apis_search})";
> 
> +our %deprecated_string_apis = (
> +	"strcpy"		=> "stracpy",
> +	"strlcpy"		=> "stracpy",
> +	"strncpy"		=> "stracpy - for non-NUL-terminated uses, strncpy dest should be __nonstring",
> +);
> +
> +#Create a search pattern for all these strings apis to speed up a loop below
> +our $deprecated_string_apis_search = "";
> +foreach my $entry (keys %deprecated_string_apis) {
> +        $deprecated_string_apis_search .= '|' if ($deprecated_string_apis_search ne "");
> +        $deprecated_string_apis_search .= $entry;
> +}
> +$deprecated_string_apis_search = "(?:${deprecated_string_apis_search})";
> +
>  our $mode_perms_world_writable = qr{
>  	S_IWUGO		|
>  	S_IWOTH		|
> @@ -6446,6 +6460,16 @@ sub process {
>  			     "Deprecated use of '$deprecated_api', prefer '$new_api' instead\n" . $herecurr);
>  		}
> 
> +# check for string deprecated apis
> +		if ($line =~ /\b($deprecated_string_apis_search)\b\s*\(/) {
> +			my $deprecated_string_api = $1;
> +			my $new_api = $deprecated_string_apis{$deprecated_string_api};
> +			my $msg_level = \&WARN;
> +			$msg_level = \&CHK if ($file);
> +			&{$msg_level}("DEPRECATED_API",
> +				      "Deprecated use of '$deprecated_string_api', prefer '$new_api' instead\n" . $herecurr);
> +		}
> +
>  # check for various structs that are normally const (ops, kgdb, device_tree)
>  # and avoid what seem like struct definitions 'struct foo {'
>  		if ($line !~ /\bconst\b/ &&
> --
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-25 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-25 11:22 [PATCH v6] Documentation/checkpatch: Prefer stracpy over strcpy/strlcpy/strncpy NitinGote
2019-07-25 18:50 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-07-25 19:19   ` Joe Perches
2019-07-25 22:57 ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201907251149.B7FD8631@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nitin.r.gote@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox