From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EE77D2F0 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726735AbfH1Vbx (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:31:53 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:23380 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726658AbfH1Vbx (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:31:53 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7SLMBHm024778; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:31:19 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2up054ahyv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:31:19 -0400 Received: from m0098416.ppops.net (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7SLOkd7030269; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:31:19 -0400 Received: from ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (ba.79.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.121.186]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2up054ahyh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:31:19 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7SLP3D1023602; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:31:18 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2ujvv6rcdt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:31:18 +0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x7SLVId327656598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:31:18 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C15B2064; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:31:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEDFB205F; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:31:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.154]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:31:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B037E16C65BD; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:31:19 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, byungchul.park@lge.com, Josh Triplett , Lai Jiangshan , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , rcu@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] rcu/tree: Add support for debug_objects debugging for kfree_rcu() Message-ID: <20190828213119.GY26530@linux.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <5d657e37.1c69fb81.54250.01df@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5d657e37.1c69fb81.54250.01df@mx.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-08-28_11:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908280207 Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:01:57PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > Make use of RCU's debug_objects debugging support > (CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD) similar to call_rcu() and other flavors. Other flavors? Ah, call_srcu(), rcu_barrier(), and srcu_barrier(), right? > We queue the object during the kfree_rcu() call and dequeue it during > reclaim. > > Tested that enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD successfully detects > double kfree_rcu() calls. > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) The code looks good! Thanx, Paul > --- > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > index 9b9ae4db1c2d..64568f12641d 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > @@ -2757,6 +2757,7 @@ static void kfree_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work) > for (; head; head = next) { > next = head->next; > /* Could be possible to optimize with kfree_bulk in future */ > + debug_rcu_head_unqueue(head); > __rcu_reclaim(rcu_state.name, head); > cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(); > } > @@ -2868,6 +2869,13 @@ void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func) > if (rcu_scheduler_active != RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING) > return kfree_call_rcu_nobatch(head, func); > > + if (debug_rcu_head_queue(head)) { > + /* Probable double kfree_rcu() */ > + WARN_ONCE(1, "kfree_call_rcu(): Double-freed call. rcu_head %p\n", > + head); > + return; > + } > + > head->func = func; > > local_irq_save(flags); /* For safely calling this_cpu_ptr(). */ > -- > 2.23.0.187.g17f5b7556c-goog >