From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CDB7D2F0 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725974AbfI2Kmv (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 06:42:51 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55288 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725924AbfI2Kmv (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 06:42:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0946020863; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:42:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1569753770; bh=ouR6V9q3KJPqpqZJmVp8djwQWpu1aWzL4JO+zDi+DHU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=vJhp5ixQu0JaUOtDCRFnssf4D8OOtIWMKQahWAef6kNlX/JoxUFS1RommlxVGXVYP 3Ep7MuVSOND2aC64z71aw1G5x1gtCIrprGNKF9eF7sG+KKUpsGVZJOM92doxjUEcdP UetlwIR/DQKuEPNH3eVnGxKl3aACu2F0A+dmaFMw= Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 12:42:47 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Dave Hansen Cc: Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, sashal@kernel.org, ben@decadent.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de, labbott@redhat.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, tsoni@codeaurora.org, keescook@chromium.org, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Documentation/process: describe relaxing disclosing party NDAs Message-ID: <20190929104247.GA1944229@kroah.com> References: <20190910172644.4D2CDF0A@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20190910172649.74639177@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20190911154453.GA14152@kroah.com> <5e9f2343-1a76-125a-9555-ab26f15b4487@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5e9f2343-1a76-125a-9555-ab26f15b4487@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:09:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 9/11/19 8:44 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > Intel had months of review time for this document before this was > > published. Your lawyers had it and never objected to this lack of > > inclusion at all, and explictitly said that the document as written was > > fine with them. So I'm sorry, but it is much too late to add something > > like this to the document at this point in time. > > Hi Greg, > > I'll personally take 100% of the blame for this patch. I intended for > it to show our commitment to work *with* our colleagues in the > community, not to dictate demands. Please consider this as you would > any other patch: a humble suggestion to address what I see as a gap. > > Just to be clear: this addition came from me and only me. It did not > come from any Intel lawyers and does not represent any kind of objection > to the process. Intel's support for this process is unconditional and > not dependent on any of these patches. Ok, thanks for the clarification. It looked like this came from Intel based on the comments you made on the other patches in this series. My confusion, sorry. I think that Thomas's rewording here makes more sense, and you seem to agree, so I'll go queue that up now. thanks, greg k-h