From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D4D7D90F for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726669AbfJJDAv (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 23:00:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f193.google.com ([209.85.214.193]:40603 "EHLO mail-pl1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726478AbfJJDAv (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 23:00:51 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f193.google.com with SMTP id d22so2037032pll.7 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:00:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=L6ILjTk0jMMMftmvOM9CzHygCFbStOs1a6k6VEE1ouM=; b=eSnlHfEUf02FrePpR5J1jTsko84CMK0y1jMta6B3aa1ZfKyJ2FOP7BzeNQ3HKLIMTO SzKkWhhC1GdQnZdg4//Dogck6+47nSI0vLTv9Gc4edJ3hyue1yuir3Wr/3BZEn6Idwod vWp8112rn/txvDFZj4El8y2IVT3YxkJMRQCSO3XWD730Z+DvaK6KtSktTVcJIhcUyD1n AJ/T4sapM5sazwJTy1RNxsq0SyekbTq/qlqcqk/7YqVrLn+mHCB74Q7Ou1julifmI+97 HjpAWBbgGd7L72OWpZhdQ9jznQJtA56oeymb9ifW7OOcamS6mB0gDOUux5WDz390WleQ 0vjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=L6ILjTk0jMMMftmvOM9CzHygCFbStOs1a6k6VEE1ouM=; b=cv7SAaUVWlIXsNiDuzJUfsLdWvwAficcW/hsLd4+JrOkn2VdBSAFf4btzB1Zrw35pk N6UQaFsxZC00suQ2QeM6x2i8LAmDREQr2ruhSBhPSnb+0SY5xlliYXhSgIdspp81DQiO zEf9u11CoXWF2bP4nQ9h0KCfCZDyc2+lzBdR2eZbnjKwnDGhUqAixPOWr7UvPAr6mQ5B oHeKRIoj1CjNIJZ3JKSiu7wuSmXycI51JQYvfzlHt4cJSHjKUJ1d/N7SukJfIjpmQzD3 XwBL7tT79FESriSRPa32G6W4unUNckcqW6QgLahqwROzH7mBfl0v5YhlHvG6gpGs8tSe R9iw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLl7oprmDKX1D8SxsioCxGi9bWwJm9Dhnwf5wiNTmPsLTwp45z 7+rZoRP2pTADHxf+kOMBTGGQSULs0XI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxkAwBrHyoiNX5V10E7ob4IF2vwmuGTnxSkiLKFR+5hNG9JZB/1UucHTs4zLOvlQwEWkQz5Bg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa43:: with SMTP id c3mr6582731plr.26.1570676450696; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Gentoo ([103.231.91.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d10sm3796515pfh.8.2019.10.09.20.00.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:30:38 +0530 From: Bhaskar Chowdhury To: Kees Cook Cc: Randy Dunlap , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Jonathan Corbet , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: Sphinx parallel build errors Message-ID: <20191010030035.GA17659@Gentoo> References: <201910091929.0C058BB@keescook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201910091929.0C058BB@keescook> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19:30 Wed 09 Oct 2019, Kees Cook wrote: >On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 02:37:51PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> Sphinx parallel build error: >> OSError: [Errno 12] Cannot allocate memory >> >> I have had this error 4 times in the last 3 days. >> >> The first time it oom-killed Thunderbird. No big deal. >> The second time it oom-killed gimp, which had 24 photos open. >> Still no big deal. Just a nuisance. > >Eek, sorry! OOM-killer once again chooses ... not the culprit. ;) > >> My little laptop has only 8 GB of RAM. >> >> Is there a way that I can limit the amount of parallelism? > >As mentioned, "make -jN htmldocs" should be respected now (before it was >as many CPUs as it had). I'm wondering if it's actually the addition of >the MAINTAINERS file parsing -- that's a really big parse and maybe that >pushed things over the edge? > >--=20 >Kees Cook Seriously, looking/parsing MAINTAINERS file becomes serious pain in the arse. It big and very easy to get lost in the way. =20 Okay, complaining for the sake of complaining doesn't make things go far ...but until we find something more efficient ,alas! We have deal with it...that kinda sucks. -Bhaskar --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEnwF+nWawchZUPOuwsjqdtxFLKRUFAl2entAACgkQsjqdtxFL KRXKuggAgBSyoTfk5EM3FIRFDOA0xmOludBKEtZNigzml6RAvRejjx39EzNpyHJP SM3u+aqWbeyh0dNgatU/yRqIfpjekvyvaKJL39BHKQlMxSqJp/l4bOE/XoggNqMS WRtunmQa2nHa8AHbkVM2OP6gCz8y9vMMSQQ4pVHgyxSIK6pHK01iZh2Ki/GE6C62 KZ13n53K/ndAFikhHUo73JFF7KrMVScynR2+Vvkx7s/74iODT8jGli6F9pWuPT3I qtCqSySlKDELDtj+SlOagpS2ePyhGzcEoiyEWFmAPLPvegISDLpT7Oc1tM44wrNb 4UiluSbdL4DwX1ZFc85S1iu0oLBMCg== =oBgw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--