From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A80BC43603 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C0620733 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="TJ/Scu83" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728309AbfLQNti (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 08:49:38 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:55230 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726962AbfLQNti (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 08:49:38 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0BBF009DDBE489521279C1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0b:bf00:9ddb:e489:5212:79c1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 629771EC0419; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:49:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1576590572; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=NnxRmWgXR04lov5uUe4Y9eBEjC/dJ8PLB6ALjMhspEU=; b=TJ/Scu83qAvDm1yqbm7OqNy1WIybTlQX6dv1VHY4h42q+MTkWzjoQk34XOqwo3EiK3kmem ecsKz+yWWT5zvbpfqkBM7vYYWEFsFKi6TYdBB2AD1ej7S9TxcqKgFZjK346LuAqiCR3IXe xDzQYaVhKbpk/VZlK+03kUkkzkdmuS0= Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:49:23 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Bhupesh Sharma Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Bhupesh SHARMA , x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel , Linux Doc Mailing List , kexec mailing list , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Jonathan Corbet , James Morse , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Steve Capper , Catalin Marinas , Ard Biesheuvel , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Dave Anderson , Kazuhito Hagio Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Append new variables to vmcoreinfo (TCR_EL1.T1SZ for arm64 and MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS for all archs) Message-ID: <20191217134923.GE28788@zn.tnic> References: <1574972621-25750-1-git-send-email-bhsharma@redhat.com> <20191214122734.GC28635@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:16:12PM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > I remember there was a suggestion during the review of an earlier > version to keep them as a separate patch(es) so that the documentation > text is easier to review, Documentation text is one sentence, respectively. Not really worth a separate patch. > I can merge the documentation patches with the respective patches > (which export the variables/defines to vmcoreinfo) in v6, Please do. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette