From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743BDC33CAF for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4728B2072B for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729565AbgAPTxf (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:53:35 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:44600 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729397AbgAPTxe (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:53:34 -0500 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A06B1E5; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:53:33 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Will Deacon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, Mark Brown , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Call out example SYM_FUNC_* usage as x86-specific Message-ID: <20200116125333.5de68e48@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20200115184305.1187-1-will@kernel.org> References: <20200115184305.1187-1-will@kernel.org> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:43:05 +0000 Will Deacon wrote: > The example given in asm-annotations.rst to describe the constraints that > a function should meet in order to be annotated with a SYM_FUNC_* macro > is x86-specific, and not necessarily applicable to architectures using > branch-and-link style calling conventions such as arm64. > > Tweak the example text to call out the x86-specific text. > > Cc: Mark Brown > Cc: Jiri Slaby > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon > --- Makes sense to me, applied, thanks. jon