From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A379C34026 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA0A24649 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="L3ZDybIg" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726353AbgBRKaI (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:30:08 -0500 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:51458 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726193AbgBRKaH (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 05:30:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=TsJ7rijmH0yW9ZZDdkUsZMwrbM/8nqThPqBsqCAkk4k=; b=L3ZDybIgpFGLp7UVUhoCXj1/g FS5mIbnpAfGKZgRDZJXQxOaKF06XZr57BggWSmgADckVoW4D7AMr8gTjS38MdEZOL9TeWol0l0bk+ U7qlP7l1mreO6UVfaOl4hYzXYUSZN3aV7Csl2bEm/70CABSFHClKiUmgot65zS+mTuLvCFaHW4EzP q4UNUUwpLqYgMeyyoDkNqOwoK5Au+kfwgup4jtPJDiyVVuhwXFm73HYINp7x+qIXcY1YfRG43Wdu8 0VkAT1CiAiATvQN4La90Pz+i2MjCwKWWOvHYy3BGQ3QzKrP9haO2YhfeX1iybGW9bhxVrPw0JNkd0 lQ9hjaEww==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:53586) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j408V-0006be-OY; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:29:52 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j408M-0000Lm-2I; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:29:42 +0000 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:29:42 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Andrew Lunn Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Felix Fietkau , Florian Fainelli , Ioana Radulescu , Jonathan Corbet , Michal Simek , Jose Abreu , Jakub Kicinski , Mark Lee , Sean Wang , Alexandre Torgue , Hauke Mehrtens , Radhey Shyam Pandey , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, John Crispin , Matthias Brugger , Giuseppe Cavallaro , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot , Maxime Coquelin , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Heiner Kallweit Subject: Re: [CFT 0/8] rework phylink interface for split MAC/PCS support Message-ID: <20200218102941.GE25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20200217172242.GZ25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200217173324.GI31084@lunn.ch> <20200217185131.GC25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200217185131.GC25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 06:51:31PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 06:33:24PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 05:22:43PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The following series changes the phylink interface to allow us to > > > better support split MAC / MAC PCS setups. The fundamental change > > > required for this turns out to be quite simple. > > > > Hi Russell > > > > Do you have a branch i can pull and test? > > Nothing beyond the branches I've mentioned in the previous heads-up as > yet, sorry. In any case, for any particular network driver, there are three patches maximum that you need - the first, and the one or two patches specific to the network driver, depending whether it's a DSA driver or not. You don't need all 8 patches to test this series. All can be applied on top of yesterday's net-next, specifically 92df9f8a745e ("Merge branch 'mvneta-xdp-ethtool-stats'") -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up