From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E157CC35669 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8ABD207FD for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="XYQ6WQet" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726787AbgBUWKq (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:10:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:38758 "EHLO mail-pf1-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726731AbgBUWKq (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:10:46 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id x185so1983335pfc.5 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:10:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7vKq81cD/QN29xYHn6q6pJWs0yVIhFoN9EiGZra3Ihw=; b=XYQ6WQet1tacXR1VZfT7hTWyzI8rHIS8e6kJpBHmweWfwysSxzwwZv1FlW0mZAAA+S Q8RKr3SEZ0MdVEiqis1bDZKsAlRSEYCjfHJ+yc8t8exywStwLFFFveNLM7mvEB2wtWmm Ohdqgk5YfUSCkVSUnlm4LlNyKpU7bzOvffvFQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7vKq81cD/QN29xYHn6q6pJWs0yVIhFoN9EiGZra3Ihw=; b=tSrtoX48eTPm82RGUJEdFHWnn2HJsvUzQcIwVEP5FKiomqzEBR6y78sh+C/Igcpa7L ZNMZjuZ/KxU3hFOPS/ChWggd6Y9zsbiNwK7AGcawJ1lOGsRYgQ+2KtJ/IzSm5ozp7jIB 7SIAJBzvVCxz6iX0kqaTs59RMZKpFeK/Fwm0RYHz27f506wGtuE6jqJTRN58jmYFwsVE 6yhVmtCOo0Hk27BkxGIIaL1GBA6wcpyuzEof0JGeo3JB8k3Bu+IiNft0a9CNay2rlslO wy35O7hRqwRfhdGMXQqv4Wjrc82U7mtRp1fPRCDbbU9/vrtE1Bd5D7FmYzaCbSuRm7gD dKJw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWCP4iN21zbvk7ppI+jAwUd9ikWRrl4E1cijIVXCHHCFfPYI1L7 bIEzftWFFx/15k/odRG/FP8bYE0bYmw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw1OjW+NvIwbFd4uPw3koB9DcsYvuSNcix0/b9rql+L6DY8NMjXU0Ynp257vp3bAlge4aSuxQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9f47:: with SMTP id h7mr37799596pfr.13.1582323045355; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:10:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b25sm3816338pfo.38.2020.02.21.14.10.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:10:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:10:42 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" Subject: Re: [Regression] Docs build broken by commit 51e46c7a4007 Message-ID: <202002211406.69D0BAFD@keescook> References: <202002201158.2911CE2388@keescook> <202002201448.62894C394@keescook> <20200221014841.3137229d@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200221014841.3137229d@lwn.net> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:48:41AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:40:01 +0100 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > 1.6.5 (I realize that it is older than recommended, but it had been > > working fine before 5.5-rc1 :-)). > > We still intend to support back to 1.4; this version should work. > > > I've tried that too, but most often I do something like "make > > O=../build/somewhere/ htmldocs". > > > > But I can do "make O=../build/somewhere/ -j 2 htmldocs" too just fine. :-) > > I suspect that the O= plays into this somehow; that's not something I do > in my own testing. I'll try to take a look at this, but I'm on the road > and somewhat distracted at the moment... Ah! Yes, I've not used O= before. I bet it's something weird between the parallelism detection of a pre-1.7 version and the O=. I'll see if I can find the problem... -- Kees Cook