From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F26C4BA0E for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FB82467F for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727974AbgBZLVo (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:21:44 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:34376 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727377AbgBZLVo (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:21:44 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 803B26D9; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 04:21:37 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Tycho Andersen Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: fix filesystems/porting.rst whitespace Message-ID: <20200226042137.05e9ead3@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20200225165954.GA11763@cisco> References: <20200220214009.11645-1-tycho@tycho.ws> <20200225032028.2bda9de8@lwn.net> <20200225165954.GA11763@cisco> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:59:54 -0700 Tycho Andersen wrote: > > So I don't see that problem in my builds, and it doesn't show in the > > version on kernel.org either. What version of sphinx are you running? > > It's actually the default vim syntax highlighter that gets confused in > my case, So this is actually a vim bug, then, right? Thanks, jon