From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: jeyu@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, rdunlap@infradead.org,
mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
jgross@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] module: Allow to disable modsign in kernel cmdline
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:35:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200428063522.GA990431@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200428060008.50417-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 02:00:08PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> This option allows to disable modsign completely at the beginning,
> and turn off by set the kernel cmdline `no_modsig_enforce` when
> `CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE` is enabled.
>
> Yet another change allows to always show the current status of
> modsign through `/sys/module/module/parameters/sig_enforce`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>
> v3 change:
> Beautify the document description according to the recommendation.
>
> v2 change:
> document this new option.
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 ++++++
> kernel/module.c | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 7bc83f3d9bdf..b30f013fb8c5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3190,6 +3190,12 @@
> noirqdebug [X86-32] Disables the code which attempts to detect and
> disable unhandled interrupt sources.
>
> + no_modsig_enforce
> + [KNL] When CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE is set, this option
> + allows to disable modsign completely at the beginning.
> + This means that modules without (valid) signatures will
> + be loaded successfully.
> +
So now we have module.sig_enforce and this one? That feels really
confusing, why can't you just use the existing option?
And why would you want to allow the bootloader to override a kernel
build option like this? That feels risky.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-28 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-28 6:00 [PATCH v3] module: Allow to disable modsign in kernel cmdline Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-28 6:35 ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-04-28 7:07 ` Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-28 7:29 ` Greg KH
2020-04-28 8:24 ` Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-28 10:02 ` Jessica Yu
2020-04-29 2:13 ` Tianjia Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200428063522.GA990431@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).