* [PATCH 1/2] docs: Add automatic cross-reference for C types
2020-09-03 0:58 [PATCH 0/2] docs: Add automatic cross-reference for C types Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
@ 2020-09-03 0:58 ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2020-09-03 0:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] kernel-doc: Update "cross-referencing from rST" section to use automarkup Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado @ 2020-09-03 0:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet; +Cc: linux-doc, linux-kernel, lkcamp, andrealmeid
In order to cross-reference C types in the documentation, Sphinx
requires the syntax :c:type:`type_name`, or even :c:type:`struct
type_name <type_name>` in order to have the link text different from the
target text.
Extend automarkup to enable automatic cross-reference of C types by
matching any "struct|union|enum|typedef type_name" expression.
This makes the documentation's plain text cleaner and adds
cross-reference to types without any additional effort by the author.
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@protonmail.com>
---
Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py | 37 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py b/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
index b18236370742..272eb2bdfab1 100644
--- a/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
+++ b/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ if sphinx.version_info[0] < 2 or \
else:
from sphinx.errors import NoUri
import re
+from itertools import chain
#
# Regex nastiness. Of course.
@@ -21,7 +22,8 @@ import re
# :c:func: block (i.e. ":c:func:`mmap()`s" flakes out), so the last
# bit tries to restrict matches to things that won't create trouble.
#
-RE_function = re.compile(r'([\w_][\w\d_]+\(\))')
+RE_function = re.compile(r'(([\w_][\w\d_]+)\(\))')
+RE_type = re.compile(r'(struct|union|enum|typedef)\s+([\w_][\w\d_]+)')
#
# Many places in the docs refer to common system calls. It is
@@ -35,31 +37,39 @@ Skipfuncs = [ 'open', 'close', 'read', 'write', 'fcntl', 'mmap',
'socket' ]
#
-# Find all occurrences of function() and try to replace them with
-# appropriate cross references.
+# Find all occurrences of C references (function() and struct/union/enum/typedef
+# type_name) and try to replace them with appropriate cross references.
#
-def markup_funcs(docname, app, node):
+def markup_c_refs(docname, app, node):
+ class_str = {RE_function: 'c-func', RE_type: 'c-type'}
+ reftype_str = {RE_function: 'function', RE_type: 'type'}
+
cdom = app.env.domains['c']
t = node.astext()
done = 0
repl = [ ]
- for m in RE_function.finditer(t):
+ #
+ # Sort all C references by the starting position in text
+ #
+ sorted_matches = sorted(chain(RE_type.finditer(t), RE_function.finditer(t)),
+ key=lambda m: m.start())
+ for m in sorted_matches:
#
- # Include any text prior to function() as a normal text node.
+ # Include any text prior to match as a normal text node.
#
if m.start() > done:
repl.append(nodes.Text(t[done:m.start()]))
#
# Go through the dance of getting an xref out of the C domain
#
- target = m.group(1)[:-2]
- target_text = nodes.Text(target + '()')
+ target = m.group(2)
+ target_text = nodes.Text(m.group(0))
xref = None
- if target not in Skipfuncs:
- lit_text = nodes.literal(classes=['xref', 'c', 'c-func'])
+ if not (m.re == RE_function and target in Skipfuncs):
+ lit_text = nodes.literal(classes=['xref', 'c', class_str[m.re]])
lit_text += target_text
pxref = addnodes.pending_xref('', refdomain = 'c',
- reftype = 'function',
+ reftype = reftype_str[m.re],
reftarget = target, modname = None,
classname = None)
#
@@ -68,7 +78,8 @@ def markup_funcs(docname, app, node):
#
try:
xref = cdom.resolve_xref(app.env, docname, app.builder,
- 'function', target, pxref, lit_text)
+ reftype_str[m.re], target, pxref,
+ lit_text)
except NoUri:
xref = None
#
@@ -97,7 +108,7 @@ def auto_markup(app, doctree, name):
for para in doctree.traverse(nodes.paragraph):
for node in para.traverse(nodes.Text):
if not isinstance(node.parent, nodes.literal):
- node.parent.replace(node, markup_funcs(name, app, node))
+ node.parent.replace(node, markup_c_refs(name, app, node))
def setup(app):
app.connect('doctree-resolved', auto_markup)
--
2.28.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] kernel-doc: Update "cross-referencing from rST" section to use automarkup
2020-09-03 0:58 [PATCH 0/2] docs: Add automatic cross-reference for C types Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2020-09-03 0:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
@ 2020-09-03 0:58 ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2020-09-03 2:43 ` [PATCH 0/2] docs: Add automatic cross-reference for C types Randy Dunlap
2020-09-03 21:33 ` Jonathan Corbet
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado @ 2020-09-03 0:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet; +Cc: linux-doc, linux-kernel, lkcamp, andrealmeid
Update text and examples in the "Cross-referencing from
reStructuredText" section to reflect that no additional syntax is needed
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@protonmail.com>
---
Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst | 33 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst b/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
index fff6604631ea..4fd86c21397b 100644
--- a/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
+++ b/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
@@ -387,22 +387,23 @@ Domain`_ references.
Cross-referencing from reStructuredText
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-To cross-reference the functions and types defined in the kernel-doc comments
-from reStructuredText documents, please use the `Sphinx C Domain`_
-references. For example::
-
- See function :c:func:`foo` and struct/union/enum/typedef :c:type:`bar`.
-
-While the type reference works with just the type name, without the
-struct/union/enum/typedef part in front, you may want to use::
-
- See :c:type:`struct foo <foo>`.
- See :c:type:`union bar <bar>`.
- See :c:type:`enum baz <baz>`.
- See :c:type:`typedef meh <meh>`.
-
-This will produce prettier links, and is in line with how kernel-doc does the
-cross-references.
+No additional syntax is needed to cross-reference the functions and types
+defined in the kernel-doc comments from reStructuredText documents.
+Just end function names with ``()`` and write ``struct``, ``union``, ``enum``
+or ``typedef`` before types.
+For example::
+
+ See foo().
+ See struct foo.
+ See union bar.
+ See enum baz.
+ See typedef meh.
+
+However, if you want custom text in the cross-reference link, that can be done
+through the following syntax::
+
+ See :c:func:`my custom link text for function foo <foo>`.
+ See :c:type:`my custom link text for struct bar <bar>`.
For further details, please refer to the `Sphinx C Domain`_ documentation.
--
2.28.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] docs: Add automatic cross-reference for C types
2020-09-03 0:58 [PATCH 0/2] docs: Add automatic cross-reference for C types Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2020-09-03 0:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2020-09-03 0:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] kernel-doc: Update "cross-referencing from rST" section to use automarkup Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
@ 2020-09-03 2:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-09-03 21:33 ` Jonathan Corbet
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2020-09-03 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado, Jonathan Corbet
Cc: linux-doc, linux-kernel, lkcamp, andrealmeid
On 9/2/20 5:58 PM, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> In order to cross-reference C types in the documentation, Sphinx
> requires the syntax :c:type:`type_name`, or even :c:type:`struct
> type_name <type_name>` in order to have the link text different from the
> target text.
> This patch series removes the need for that markup.
>
> The first commit extends the automarkup script to enable automatic
> cross-reference of C types by matching any "struct|union|enum|typedef type_name"
> expression.
> This makes the documentation's plain text cleaner and adds cross-reference to
> types without any additional effort by the author.
>
> The second commit updates the "Cross-referencing from
> reStructuredText" section in Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
> to reflect that no additional syntax is needed when cross-referencing both types
> and functions anymore.
>
> When testing this, I did find an edge-case from the output of
> Documentation/output/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.rst on the "typedef struct scsi_cmnd
> Scsi_Cmnd;", where 'typedef struct' is being identified as a reference, but
> there isn't any named 'struct', so it renders bold.
There also isn't any file name scsi_typedefs.h any longer,
so maybe we can update scsi_mid_low_api.rst as well.
Thanks.
> I thought of adding an ignore_names list just like there is one for functions,
> with 'struct' in it, to workaround this edge case, but since it was the only
> one I found, and also because it was unclear what the desired output was
> (cross-reference 'struct scsi_cmnd' or leave the whole expression as plain text)
> I wanted to get some feedback beforehand.
>
> After getting this merged I intend to start removing the occurrences of :c:type.
>
> Thanks,
> Nícolas
>
> Nícolas F. R. A. Prado (2):
> docs: Add automatic cross-reference for C types
> kernel-doc: Update "cross-referencing from rST" section to use
> automarkup
>
> Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst | 33 ++++++++++++-----------
> Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py | 37 +++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] docs: Add automatic cross-reference for C types
2020-09-03 0:58 [PATCH 0/2] docs: Add automatic cross-reference for C types Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-03 2:43 ` [PATCH 0/2] docs: Add automatic cross-reference for C types Randy Dunlap
@ 2020-09-03 21:33 ` Jonathan Corbet
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2020-09-03 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado; +Cc: linux-doc, linux-kernel, lkcamp, andrealmeid
On Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:58:09 +0000
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@protonmail.com> wrote:
> In order to cross-reference C types in the documentation, Sphinx
> requires the syntax :c:type:`type_name`, or even :c:type:`struct
> type_name <type_name>` in order to have the link text different from the
> target text.
> This patch series removes the need for that markup.
>
> The first commit extends the automarkup script to enable automatic
> cross-reference of C types by matching any "struct|union|enum|typedef type_name"
> expression.
> This makes the documentation's plain text cleaner and adds cross-reference to
> types without any additional effort by the author.
>
> The second commit updates the "Cross-referencing from
> reStructuredText" section in Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
> to reflect that no additional syntax is needed when cross-referencing both types
> and functions anymore.
So I've looked this over, applied it, looked at how the output changes,
and generally put an untoward amount of effort into finding something to
grumble about.
I failed.
This is a great change - thanks for stepping up and doing it!
> When testing this, I did find an edge-case from the output of
> Documentation/output/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.rst on the "typedef struct scsi_cmnd
> Scsi_Cmnd;", where 'typedef struct' is being identified as a reference, but
> there isn't any named 'struct', so it renders bold.
> I thought of adding an ignore_names list just like there is one for functions,
> with 'struct' in it, to workaround this edge case, but since it was the only
> one I found, and also because it was unclear what the desired output was
> (cross-reference 'struct scsi_cmnd' or leave the whole expression as plain text)
> I wanted to get some feedback beforehand.
As Randy pointed out, the documentation in question is obsolete and
incorrect anyway; there's really not much that can be done in the docs
build system to fix *that*. I'm not going to worry about this particular
glitch. If you felt so inspired, a patch to the SCSI maintainers just
removing that paragraph might be well received.
I'm going to go ahead and push this out to linux-next; we'll see if
anything explodes from there.
Thanks,
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread