From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EEDC43464 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5AE206B7 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="OkQQJA4n" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727652AbgIRDB4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 23:01:56 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:44497 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728185AbgIRDBd (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 23:01:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600398092; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=08vvKo7W8fzgKzRki0M2Us+rPrn1t1DRF38EQBkZbD0=; b=OkQQJA4nqPKXGR9479X/0V+z3L3UMzVHo6TmnVlRg5Nyn4NpgOc6n7hNYaQ17Ti395ip5f H0c/M49u/PRdO+41WFNwyqqAvYarP6q+roFeFdJy2E6UU2tz2gfq8iLHi1eWJs/moBVLWr obzt3DaPmSgHjuwlVCOzkBBB5/FVGn8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-357-CC16NPrCO_q5BV3RSOZkzw-1; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 23:01:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: CC16NPrCO_q5BV3RSOZkzw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F283910060C2; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com (ovpn-13-81.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.81]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA00455766; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:01:12 +0800 From: Dave Young To: Chen Zhou Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bhe@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, John.P.donnelly@oracle.com, prabhakar.pkin@gmail.com, bhsharma@redhat.com, horms@verge.net.au, robh+dt@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, nsaenzjulienne@suse.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, xiexiuqi@huawei.com, huawei.libin@huawei.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/9] x86: kdump: use macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX in functions reserve_crashkernel[_low]() Message-ID: <20200918030112.GA3356@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> References: <20200907134745.25732-1-chenzhou10@huawei.com> <20200907134745.25732-4-chenzhou10@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200907134745.25732-4-chenzhou10@huawei.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On 09/07/20 at 09:47pm, Chen Zhou wrote: > To make the functions reserve_crashkernel[_low]() as generic, > replace some hard-coded numbers with macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou > --- > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 11 ++++++----- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > index d7fd90c52dae..71a6a6e7ca5b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c > @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void) > unsigned long total_low_mem; > int ret; > > - total_low_mem = memblock_mem_size(1UL << (32 - PAGE_SHIFT)); > + total_low_mem = memblock_mem_size(CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX >> PAGE_SHIFT); total_low_mem != CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX > > /* crashkernel=Y,low */ > ret = parse_crashkernel_low(boot_command_line, total_low_mem, &low_size, &base); The param total_low_mem is for dynamically change crash_size according to system ram size. Is above change a must for your arm64 patches? > @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void) > return 0; > } > > - low_base = memblock_find_in_range(CRASH_ALIGN, 1ULL << 32, low_size, CRASH_ALIGN); > + low_base = memblock_find_in_range(CRASH_ALIGN, CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX, low_size, CRASH_ALIGN); > if (!low_base) { > pr_err("Cannot reserve %ldMB crashkernel low memory, please try smaller size.\n", > (unsigned long)(low_size >> 20)); > @@ -504,8 +504,9 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > if (!crash_base) { > /* > * Set CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX upper bound for crash memory, > - * crashkernel=x,high reserves memory over 4G, also allocates > - * 256M extra low memory for DMA buffers and swiotlb. > + * crashkernel=x,high reserves memory over CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX, > + * also allocates 256M extra low memory for DMA buffers > + * and swiotlb. > * But the extra memory is not required for all machines. > * So try low memory first and fall back to high memory > * unless "crashkernel=size[KMG],high" is specified. > @@ -539,7 +540,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > return; > } > > - if (crash_base >= (1ULL << 32) && reserve_crashkernel_low()) { > + if (crash_base >= CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX && reserve_crashkernel_low()) { > memblock_free(crash_base, crash_size); > return; > } > -- > 2.20.1 >