From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05330C6369E for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 01:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B74C246CA for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 01:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=roeck-us.net header.i=@roeck-us.net header.b="E9zWzlCt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727360AbgKSBvi (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:51:38 -0500 Received: from gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.38.55]:57866 "EHLO gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726413AbgKSBvh (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:51:37 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1482 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:51:37 EST Received: from cmgw10.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.10]) by gproxy5.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963F014120C for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:26:55 -0700 (MST) Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id fYitkNpbODlydfYitkDzKL; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:26:55 -0700 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Dfw5VMlW c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=QNED+QcLUkoL9qulTODnwA==:117 a=2cfIYNtKkjgZNaOwnGXpGw==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10:nop_charset_1 a=nNwsprhYR40A:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=evQFzbml-YQA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=TLnMg8FhEQBKgHsLnTUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10:nop_charset_2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=roeck-us.net; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References :Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=75vtt6jxidqhOOdCVtUR7LT8iFbu0C38IO/svWRLDBE=; b=E9zWzlCtQXoPMglx8dz8xDM6qM F4w5cKFef8QuAenhDxrwP75qEHEs+STbTNSyeAmPtdEr5Axm6rcbyXxmeNDiGbFg416zS8cK4xalu RrJH/baG8ClqJB1UbtMIf05+h5UvK96P+/phIbuW8m3UVFWddFWmO7Ih/hzwNJLix6x4aEsU4lzyC qdFJkhg/hOVCt7P0kjkP1pFYDNvlqti616tRewVs8fu9J8qsUa+NT1oLYn5/IGekDyxDo+yHhkX8k kVG1XXRWY0QidkgasF0bfbGTTwg/ykWBnpMZhvcbesGTlem10D9JPrYqUEHOBG54G3Pe1G8ewrBQq nvmnkG2w==; Received: from 108-223-40-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net ([108.223.40.66]:57144 helo=localhost) by bh-25.webhostbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1kfYis-000JnP-0s; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 01:26:54 +0000 Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:26:53 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Tao Ren Cc: Andrew Lunn , Jean Delvare , Jonathan Corbet , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, taoren@fb.com, mikechoi@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] hwmon: (max127) Add Maxim MAX127 hardware monitoring Message-ID: <20201119012653.GA249502@roeck-us.net> References: <20201118230929.18147-1-rentao.bupt@gmail.com> <20201118232719.GI1853236@lunn.ch> <20201118234252.GA18681@taoren-ubuntu-R90MNF91> <20201119010119.GA248686@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201119010119.GA248686@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 108.223.40.66 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1kfYis-000JnP-0s X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 108-223-40-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (localhost) [108.223.40.66]:57144 X-Source-Auth: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Email-Count: 25 X-Source-Cap: cm9lY2s7YWN0aXZzdG07YmgtMjUud2ViaG9zdGJveC5uZXQ= X-Local-Domain: yes Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 05:01:19PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:42:53PM -0800, Tao Ren wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:27:19AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:09:27PM -0800, rentao.bupt@gmail.com wrote: > > > > From: Tao Ren > > > > > > > > The patch series adds hardware monitoring driver for the Maxim MAX127 > > > > chip. > > > > > > Hi Tao > > > > > > Why are using sending a hwmon driver to the networking mailing list? > > > > > > Andrew > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > I added netdev because the mailing list is included in "get_maintainer.pl > > Documentation/hwmon/index.rst" output. Is it the right command to find > > reviewers? Could you please suggest? Thank you. > > I have no idea why running get_maintainer.pl on > Documentation/hwmon/index.rst returns such a large list of mailing > lists and people. For some reason it includes everyone in the XDP > maintainer list. If anyone has an idea how that happens, please > let me know - we'll want to get this fixed to avoid the same problem > in the future. > I found it. The XDP maintainer entry has: K: xdp This matches Documentation/hwmon/index.rst. $ grep xdp Documentation/hwmon/index.rst xdpe12284 It seems to me that a context match such as "xdp" in MAINTAINERS isn't really appropriate. "xdp" matches a total of 348 files in the kernel. The large majority of those is not XDP related. The maintainers of XDP (and all the listed mailing lists) should not be surprised to get a large number of odd review requests if they want to review every single patch on files which include the term "xdp". Guenter