From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F88C83017 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121712168B for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404321AbgLAT37 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:29:59 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:33710 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726148AbgLAT36 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:29:58 -0500 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B2D7750; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 12:29:16 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Szabolcs Nagy , adobriyan@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: document /proc api for arm64 MTE vm flags Message-ID: <20201201122916.0c4ac9bf@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20201201190406.GC2502@gaia> References: <20201106101940.5777-1-szabolcs.nagy@arm.com> <20201120144408.GE24344@gaia> <20201120110003.5bba61d5@lwn.net> <20201120222413.GA28722@gaia> <20201201190406.GC2502@gaia> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:04:06 +0000 Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > > Are you ok with picking up this patch (it can be left for 5.11) or > > > > should I queue it in the arm64 tree? > > > > > > It wasn't sent to me, so it wasn't on my radar. Up to you, I'm happy to > > > grab it if you'd prefer. > > > > Please do grab it. Thanks. > > In case it slipped through the cracks (I haven't seen it in -next). > Otherwise I'll queue it sometime later this week for 5.11. Um ... yes ... I was just going to apply it right now, honest ... Applied, thanks for the reminder. jon