From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5996CC433DB for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A06B23772 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728633AbhAORU4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 12:20:56 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:37762 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727049AbhAORU4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2021 12:20:56 -0500 Received: from lwn.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70EC26144; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:20:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 70EC26144 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1610731215; bh=oqtY8FiVdPzSIv0x1ovYAKgJlnLzyaUv/KHtQfpJhDU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HgJpJDItOsE06j+N7/+v5CzKXdhMg+fmiAp+75mQuLLAEo4XtBRu9XfzZ8wZZr8Wj 4cgyjc29cdWDsZoRQDfZotmkLJgQvcDzSzZfdLcq8EtC8NdcPncQwJ/X5fj0a7rx9C DOWTA5HRPxEk3wubj8BGe4ru76bpYx43A7XPud2tYowdjfNg+6CQ9vwz+xfaZLORjI hfuDIyKlUax/4rnsS/K2sfrb80qrXVmlgE/LFcrPL6cerBjn1fC4OF4nN6AIJ/bO2m 4uBnGkTLXCP26Xn7RktdLtnLJ6aSvdkgC7Fyp2OhvG70adg1O5zeuxcOFETJCA1u+U B+vv4YTqYjBTg== Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:20:14 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mark Brown Cc: Mark Rutland , Josh Poimboeuf , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina , Joe Lawrence , Miroslav Benes , Petr Mladek , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vgert.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace Message-ID: <20210115102014.76e51309@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20210115171251.GF4384@sirena.org.uk> References: <20210115142446.13880-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20210115164718.GE44111@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> <20210115171251.GF4384@sirena.org.uk> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:12:51 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:47:18PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 02:24:46PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > + 3. Considerations > > > + 3.1 Identifying successful termination > > > It looks like we forgot to update this with the addition of the new > > section 3, so this needs a trivial update to add that and fix the > > numbering. > > Bah, I thought the point with structured documentation formats was that > tooling would handle stuff like this :/ The tooling *will* handle it if you let it, it's a simple matter of replacing the hand-generated table of contents with a Sphinx directive. I think that's generally the right thing to do, but it does have the downside of only putting the TOC in the generated docs. Thanks, jon