From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
Tarun Gupta <targupta@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] vfio: Make vfio_device_ops pass a 'struct vfio_device *' instead of 'void *'
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:58:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210310125826.GV2356281@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hqALoBpH-yir4WNPj4+z1n-zj4o_6bfOMBRmd5sOCMNw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:52:30PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:39 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is the standard kernel pattern, the ops associated with a struct get
> > the struct pointer in for typesafety. The expected design is to use
> > container_of to cleanly go from the subsystem level type to the driver
> > level type without having any type erasure in a void *.
>
> This patch alone is worth the price of admission.
Right, this is how I got here as I was going to do the mdev stuff and
we end up doing transformations like this:
-static long mtty_ioctl(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int cmd,
+static long mtty_ioctl(struct vfio_device *vdev, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg)
And if the 'struct vfio_device *vdev' was left a 'void *' then the
compiler doesn't get to help any more :(
> Seems like it would be worth adding
> to_vfio_{pci,platform,fsl_mc}_device() helpers in this patch as well.
I have mixed feelings on these one-liners. If people feel they are
worthwhile I'll add them
> I've sometimes added runtime type safety to to_* helpers for early
> warning of mistakes that happen when refactoring...
>
> static inline struct vfio_pci_device *
> to_vfio_pci_device(struct vfio_device *core_dev)
> {
> if (dev_WARN_ONCE(core_dev->dev, core_dev->ops != &vfio_pci_ops,
> "not a vfio_pci_device!\n"))
> return NULL;
> return container_of(core_vdev, struct vfio_pci_device, vdev);
In this case I don't think we need to worry as everything is tidy in a
single module such that the compilation units can't see other
container_of options anyhow and vfio core isn't going to accidently
call an ops with the wrong type.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-10 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-09 21:38 [PATCH 00/10] Embed struct vfio_device in all sub-structures Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-09 21:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] vfio: Split creation of a vfio_device into init and register ops Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-10 7:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-12 13:04 ` Liu, Yi L
2021-03-12 14:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-12 16:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-09 21:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] vfio: Make vfio_device_ops pass a 'struct vfio_device *' instead of 'void *' Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-10 5:52 ` Dan Williams
2021-03-10 6:24 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-03-10 12:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-03-10 20:01 ` Dan Williams
2021-03-12 13:42 ` Liu, Yi L
2021-03-12 14:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-09 21:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] vfio: Remove device_data from the vfio bus driver API Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-10 7:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-10 23:52 ` [PATCH 00/10] Embed struct vfio_device in all sub-structures Alex Williamson
2021-03-10 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210310125826.GV2356281@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).