From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907C7C43460 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643CF60E0C for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233759AbhDZOSb (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:18:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44062 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233560AbhDZOSa (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:18:30 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc33.google.com (mail-oo1-xc33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7D02C061574; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc33.google.com with SMTP id a188-20020a4a4cc50000b02901f0ae7068a1so4271158oob.13; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:17:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=+XfLmAGVjDqh4bLpk3FH98At1RwV7/JgpCPPTL5UDqA=; b=bCMMgG/l35c6tfRPhcsXkIe6TzFlIMp/H+Lg7wTFhSxTb8RB5BOBXij9O8JXKaSqkP 9t8hcbVabGGELsFU1SJxJ6Y71G9r1MM7/TOwBxsd4U6OwYL+m9UYJ59pwYQV4GlX+RZV T4KNGyDwFxxJ5RInHNYQ79zFvUk4kxwmhVtayUbA5rxQEb0xcDiwiCsXNxuHpqJvmG8m 34EhfBZ4m45IW676BOE0Yks48qqWPh3z1FhYGFx7qDG7luTKrZFKtvY0zIn73KWxz3v/ X/gbx+r/lRrnY59lnfohoiN89vLQRqB17xrn0wa2IADI0ZzK3ze/1FndMfCgnSqa2C9H dDEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=+XfLmAGVjDqh4bLpk3FH98At1RwV7/JgpCPPTL5UDqA=; b=pRPTCx2+6eCz2GD7NFMLvzD2jtsTKCwJZUl33eYQ7V6x1/wtA2Cz7ddmk6g0IRXth3 RRwAcXpz9DieOzl7Tt/lHVx+IOvnh5RUXWqTK41VSJgPdfd8emRghlGmnq0rcoHcdrdi O1tcvIcaqSS0PrhJE3My86n8Y7R4OXLwexNhQ2EFEoRjJwE0rkIXfUF33T2ugbJPY59Y aFDYJKS69zP1m32UwqX2eLPPJQEqYjoofQfeon5TrYL6sh1CV0A1zoDpzNmKLy+cZjVt XYFYe2GRNbDf2KRDI6jJmdn+aZxj4IXxzQlcJyGbyIv5hZ3lTuI0ivmfT2cMxQP0poL5 bWZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZC5hmT0ZXHH4wODqUZjsTjXQRGBid3qH0sWQ5PwGbEjkzJNV1 w/ClslwFFgMOSb2ff63EBmI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwuTWLQy2jDoLqFc7IzHqUfX97rJz5dFgYVhIK7DziYo1Wjn6BcAFyBsliLkHstZdoTf8+lEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:4c43:: with SMTP id a64mr8182158oob.1.1619446668154; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g5sm3079937oiy.24.2021.04.26.07.17.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:17:45 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=E1clav_Kubern=E1t?= Cc: Jean Delvare , Jonathan Corbet , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] hwmon: (max31790) Rework to use regmap Message-ID: <20210426141745.GA257701@roeck-us.net> References: <20210413025948.901867-1-kubernat@cesnet.cz> <250c1c16-541a-984f-c720-1a8b6176e97e@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:46:27PM +0200, Václav Kubernát wrote: > Hello. > > I'm sending a new version of my patch on max31790. This new version > fixes the cache issue and actually makes it work by setting > .cache_type. You were right about the "yes/no" ranges, so I flipped > those. > > By the way, it seems that the reason your reply got lost is because of > weird addresses in the "Cc:" email field, they end with "cesnet.cz", > so it could be that I'm sending email incorrectly. Let me know if I'm > doing something wrong. > Yes, the To: field of your series is either empty (for the first patch of the series), or it is something like: To: unlisted-recipients: no To-header on input <; Also, you send your follow-up series as response of the previous series which doesn't follow the guidance for submitting patches and may result in the entire series getting lost. Guenter