From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A69C433B4 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A39E613CD for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231643AbhEKO4o (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 10:56:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54876 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231609AbhEKO4n (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 10:56:43 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38650C06174A; Tue, 11 May 2021 07:55:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=X8lDMzJEEbXETyVQFtFTx8ZhSJFE1TZtWKxi3YFPp0c=; b=toF8HtbtqJXqfoBCRkXfHJJnN bHuW1jFiDft5IunD0UGQxOp6uUWyDaAHqBZF6CUXEWfx5rlZ8ZLAi69tQwZTWenffikWdnQVtQ6zy GTtVzqT2WmStzeRXO7K73YC35ig06Abf41+kuIbfbAuHfBQuM4FU0MOm86aILtvui+M/LrWm+Jp6Q K2bpD0++pRGcaiMqhRJXaxzVhJ8B2aMH0E2BJZeIFl0s1evTfEWXYiT6IH1nBPfQQvtyIWXxalRpX Igi3anwmDEHCdkeG48pYVtgxYqbRLOI6jkH7ptCfZJ3mcI01CCDZIMZtiAftQM9Nii7WgDiOKZfS0 e6kvjacKQ==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:43868) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lgTnF-0002nL-Qc; Tue, 11 May 2021 15:55:29 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lgTnF-0001B9-JL; Tue, 11 May 2021 15:55:29 +0100 Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 15:55:29 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Ansuel Smith Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Matthew Wilcox , Jonathan Corbet , Linus Walleij , Florian Fainelli , Abbott Liu , Luis Chamberlain , Palmer Dabbelt , Linux Doc Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Enlarge IO_SPACE_LIMIT needed for some SoC Message-ID: <20210511145529.GN1336@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20210511021656.17719-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:51:15PM +0200, Ansuel Smith wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:46:49PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > OK, so the entire second host bridge fails to probe, because there is > > no virtual address space left for the I/O window. > > > > Just change the 'downstream I/O' window size in the DT to 64k > > (0x10000) - I assume the current size (0x100000) is a typo anyway. > > Ok, so my fear were right... someone just typo the IO when the dtsi was > pushed and was wrong from all that times. Much easier and cleaner > solution. Great news. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!