linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Flavio Suligoi" <f.suligoi@asem.it>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] pwm: core: Always require PWM flags to be provided
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 22:49:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210531194947.10770-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531194947.10770-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

It makes little sense to make PWM flags optional since in case
of multi-channel consumer the flags can be optional only for
the last listed channel. Thus always require PWM flags to be
provided.

Fixes: 4a6ef8e37c4d ("pwm: Add support referencing PWMs from ACPI")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
v2: no change
 drivers/pwm/core.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index c165c5822703..25f7b3370672 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -852,8 +852,10 @@ static struct pwm_chip *device_to_pwmchip(struct device *dev)
  *
  * This is analogous to of_pwm_get() except con_id is not yet supported.
  * ACPI entries must look like
- * Package () {"pwms", Package ()
- *     { <PWM device reference>, <PWM index>, <PWM period> [, <PWM flags>]}}
+ * Package () { "pwms", Package () {
+ *		<PWM device reference>, <PWM index>, <PWM period>, <PWM flags>,
+ *	}
+ * }
  *
  * Returns: A pointer to the requested PWM device or an ERR_PTR()-encoded
  * error code on failure.
@@ -877,7 +879,7 @@ static struct pwm_device *acpi_pwm_get(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
 	if (!acpi)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	if (args.nargs < 2)
+	if (args.nargs < 3)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPROTO);
 
 	chip = device_to_pwmchip(&acpi->dev);
@@ -891,7 +893,7 @@ static struct pwm_device *acpi_pwm_get(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
 	pwm->args.period = args.args[1];
 	pwm->args.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
 
-	if (args.nargs > 2 && args.args[2] & PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED)
+	if (args.args[2] & PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED)
 		pwm->args.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
 #endif
 
-- 
2.30.2


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-31 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-31 19:49 [PATCH v2 1/7] docs: firmware-guide: ACPI: Add a PWM example Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-31 19:49 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-06-06 21:30   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] pwm: core: Always require PWM flags to be provided Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-07  9:02     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-07  9:53       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-07 10:15         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-07 10:21           ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-07 11:49             ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-07 14:11               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-05-31 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] pwm: core: Convert to use fwnode for matching Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-31 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] pwm: core: Reuse fwnode_to_pwmchip() in ACPI case Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-31 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] pwm: core: Unify fwnode checks in the module Andy Shevchenko
2021-05-31 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] pwm: core: Remove unused devm_pwm_put() Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-06 21:40   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-05-31 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] pwm: core: Simplify some devm_*pwm*() functions Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-06 21:45   ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210531194947.10770-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=f.suligoi@asem.it \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).