From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5] docs: Explain the desired position of function attributes
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 08:26:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211005152611.4120605-1-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
While discussing how to format the addition of various function
attributes, some "unwritten rules" of ordering surfaced[1]. Capture as
close as possible to Linus's preferences for future reference.
(Though I note the dissent voiced by Joe Perches, Alexey Dobriyan, and
others that would prefer all attributes live on a separate leading line.)
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/CAHk-=wiOCLRny5aifWNhr621kYrJwhfURsa0vFPeUEm8mF0ufg@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
v5:
- drop extern (joe)
- fix __malloc position (miguel)
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210930235754.2635912-1-keescook@chromium.org
---
Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
index 42969ab37b34..5756ff775233 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
@@ -480,13 +480,48 @@ closing function brace line. E.g.:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(system_is_up);
+6.1) Function prototypes
+************************
+
In function prototypes, include parameter names with their data types.
Although this is not required by the C language, it is preferred in Linux
because it is a simple way to add valuable information for the reader.
-Do not use the ``extern`` keyword with function prototypes as this makes
+Do not use the ``extern`` keyword with function declarations as this makes
lines longer and isn't strictly necessary.
+When writing function prototypes, please keep the `order of elements regular
+<https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/CAHk-=wiOCLRny5aifWNhr621kYrJwhfURsa0vFPeUEm8mF0ufg@mail.gmail.com/>`_.
+For example, using this function declaration example::
+
+ __init void * __must_check action(enum magic value, size_t size, u8 count,
+ char *fmt, ...) __printf(4, 5) __malloc;
+
+The preferred order of elements for a function prototype is:
+
+- storage class (below, ``static __always_inline``, noting that ``__always_inline``
+ is technically an attribute but is treated like ``inline``)
+- storage class attributes (here, ``__init`` -- i.e. section declarations, but also
+ things like ``__cold``)
+- return type (here, ``void *``)
+- return type attributes (here, ``__must_check``)
+- function name (here, ``action``)
+- function parameters (here, ``(enum magic value, size_t size, u8 count, char *fmt, ...)``,
+ noting that parameter names should always be included)
+- function parameter attributes (here, ``__printf(4, 5)``)
+- function behavior attributes (here, ``__malloc``)
+
+Note that for a function **definition** (i.e. the actual function body),
+the compiler does not allow function parameter attributes after the
+function parameters. In these cases, they should go after the storage
+class attributes (e.g. note the changed position of ``__printf(4, 5)``
+below, compared to the **declaration** example above)::
+
+ static __always_inline __init __printf(4, 5) void * __must_check action(enum magic value,
+ size_t size, u8 count, char *fmt, ...) __malloc
+ {
+ ...
+ }
7) Centralized exiting of functions
-----------------------------------
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-05 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-05 15:26 Kees Cook [this message]
2021-10-05 15:39 ` [PATCH v5] docs: Explain the desired position of function attributes Joe Perches
2021-10-05 17:04 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-05 19:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-10-06 0:51 ` Joe Perches
2021-10-12 19:35 ` Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211005152611.4120605-1-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).