From: frowand.list@gmail.com
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
Tim.Bird@sony.com, Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: rmr167@gmail.com, guillaume.tucker@collabora.com,
dlatypov@google.com, kernelci@groups.io,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: fix KTAP specification build warnings
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 20:35:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220210023519.3221051-3-frowand.list@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210023519.3221051-1-frowand.list@gmail.com>
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Convert "Major differences between TAP and KTAP" from a bullet list
to a table. The bullet list was being formatted as a single
paragraph.
Add missing required argument in code-block directives.
---
Table conversion suggested by Shuah.
Patch 2/2 not previously reviewed, so Reviewed-by tags not provided.
Changes since version 3
- Add this commit (patch 2/2) to the series
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
---
Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst | 33 +++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
index dfb3f10a8b2d..5ee735c6687f 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Test case result lines
Test case result lines indicate the final status of a test.
They are required and must have the format:
-.. code-block::
+.. code-block:: none
<result> <number> [<description>][ # [<directive>] [<diagnostic data>]]
@@ -117,32 +117,32 @@ separator.
Example result lines include:
-.. code-block::
+.. code-block:: none
ok 1 test_case_name
The test "test_case_name" passed.
-.. code-block::
+.. code-block:: none
not ok 1 test_case_name
The test "test_case_name" failed.
-.. code-block::
+.. code-block:: none
ok 1 test # SKIP necessary dependency unavailable
The test "test" was SKIPPED with the diagnostic message "necessary dependency
unavailable".
-.. code-block::
+.. code-block:: none
not ok 1 test # TIMEOUT 30 seconds
The test "test" timed out, with diagnostic data "30 seconds".
-.. code-block::
+.. code-block:: none
ok 5 check return code # rcode=0
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ allowed to be either indented or not indented.
An example of a test with two nested subtests:
-.. code-block::
+.. code-block:: none
KTAP version 1
1..1
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ An example of a test with two nested subtests:
An example format with multiple levels of nested testing:
-.. code-block::
+.. code-block:: none
KTAP version 1
1..2
@@ -234,12 +234,15 @@ An example format with multiple levels of nested testing:
Major differences between TAP and KTAP
--------------------------------------
-Note the major differences between the TAP and KTAP specification:
-- yaml and json are not recommended in KTAP diagnostic messages
-- TODO directive not recognized in KTAP
-- KTAP allows for an arbitrary number of tests to be nested
-- TAP includes "Unknown lines" in the category of "Anything else"
-- TAP says "Unknown lines" are "incorrect"; KTAP allows "Unknown lines"
+================================================== ========= ===============
+Feature TAP KTAP
+================================================== ========= ===============
+yaml and json in diagnosic message ok not recommended
+TODO directive ok not recognized
+allows an arbitrary number of tests to be nested no yes
+"Unknown lines" are in category of "Anything else" yes no
+"Unknown lines" are incorrect allowed
+================================================== ========= ===============
The TAP14 specification does permit nested tests, but instead of using another
nested version line, uses a line of the form
@@ -247,7 +250,7 @@ nested version line, uses a line of the form
Example KTAP output
--------------------
-.. code-block::
+.. code-block:: none
KTAP version 1
1..1
--
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-10 2:35 [PATCH v4 0/2] Documentation: dev-tools: clarify KTAP specification wording frowand.list
2022-02-10 2:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " frowand.list
2022-02-10 17:43 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-10 2:35 ` frowand.list [this message]
2022-02-10 7:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: fix KTAP specification build warnings David Gow
2022-02-10 17:25 ` Shuah Khan
2022-02-10 17:43 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220210023519.3221051-3-frowand.list@gmail.com \
--to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=guillaume.tucker@collabora.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernelci@groups.io \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmoar@google.com \
--cc=rmr167@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox