From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com,
pmorel@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
svens@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, vneethv@linux.ibm.com,
oberpar@linux.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 15/21] KVM: s390: pci: add routines to start/stop interpretive execution
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 12:14:00 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220427151400.GY2125828@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220426200842.98655-16-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 04:08:36PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> +int kvm_s390_pci_register_kvm(struct zpci_dev *zdev, struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + if (!zdev)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Register device with this KVM (or remove the KVM association if 0).
> + * If interpetation facilities are available, enable them and let
> + * userspace indicate whether or not they will be used (specify SHM bit
> + * to disable).
> + */
> + if (kvm)
> + return register_kvm(zdev, kvm);
> + else
> + return unregister_kvm(zdev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_s390_pci_register_kvm);
I think it is cleaner to expose both the register/unregister APIs and
not multiplex them like this
> +void kvm_s390_pci_clear_list(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + struct kvm_zdev *tmp, *kzdev;
> + LIST_HEAD(remove);
> +
> + spin_lock(&kvm->arch.kzdev_list_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(kzdev, tmp, &kvm->arch.kzdev_list, entry)
> + list_move_tail(&kzdev->entry, &remove);
> + spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.kzdev_list_lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(kzdev, tmp, &remove, entry)
> + unregister_kvm(kzdev->zdev);
Hum, I wonder if this is a mistake in kvm:
static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
{
[..]
kvm_arch_destroy_vm(kvm);
kvm_destroy_devices(kvm);
kvm_destroy_devices() triggers the VFIO notifier with NULL. Indeed for
correctness I would expect the VFIO users to have been notified to
release the kvm before the kvm object becomes partially destroyed?
Maybe you should investigate re-ordering this at the KVM side and just
WARN_ON(!list_empty) in the arch code?
(vfio has this odd usage model where it should use the kvm pointer
without taking a ref on it so long as the unregister hasn't been
called)
If you keep it like this then the locking in register/unregister looks
not broad enough and has to cover the zdev->kzdev also.
Overall I think it is OK designed like this, aside from the ugly
symbol_get in vfio which I hope you can resolve.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-26 20:08 [PATCH v6 00/21] KVM: s390: enable zPCI for interpretive execution Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 01/21] s390/sclp: detect the zPCI load/store interpretation facility Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 02/21] s390/sclp: detect the AISII facility Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 03/21] s390/sclp: detect the AENI facility Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 04/21] s390/sclp: detect the AISI facility Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 05/21] s390/airq: pass more TPI info to airq handlers Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 06/21] s390/airq: allow for airq structure that uses an input vector Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 07/21] s390/pci: externalize the SIC operation controls and routine Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 08/21] s390/pci: stash associated GISA designation Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 09/21] s390/pci: stash dtsm and maxstbl Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 10/21] KVM: s390: pci: add basic kvm_zdev structure Matthew Rosato
2022-04-27 8:41 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-27 13:25 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 11/21] KVM: s390: pci: do initial setup for AEN interpretation Matthew Rosato
2022-05-05 10:16 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 12/21] KVM: s390: pci: enable host forwarding of Adapter Event Notifications Matthew Rosato
2022-05-05 12:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 13/21] KVM: s390: mechanism to enable guest zPCI Interpretation Matthew Rosato
2022-05-05 13:10 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 14/21] KVM: s390: pci: provide routines for enabling/disabling interrupt forwarding Matthew Rosato
2022-05-06 15:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-05-06 15:55 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 15/21] KVM: s390: pci: add routines to start/stop interpretive execution Matthew Rosato
2022-04-27 15:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-04-27 20:20 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-28 12:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 16/21] vfio-pci/zdev: add open/close device hooks Matthew Rosato
2022-04-27 14:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-27 14:42 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-27 15:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-27 15:26 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-27 15:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-06 15:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 17/21] vfio-pci/zdev: add function handle to clp base capability Matthew Rosato
2022-05-06 16:02 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 18/21] vfio-pci/zdev: different maxstbl for interpreted devices Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 19/21] KVM: s390: add KVM_S390_ZPCI_OP to manage guest zPCI devices Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 20/21] KVM: s390: introduce CPU feature for zPCI Interpretation Matthew Rosato
2022-04-26 20:08 ` [PATCH v6 21/21] MAINTAINERS: additional files related kvm s390 pci passthrough Matthew Rosato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220427151400.GY2125828@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).