From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
kwankhede@nvidia.com, corbet@lwn.net, hca@linux.ibm.com,
gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@intel.com,
jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com,
airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, farman@linux.ibm.com,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
vneethv@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com,
freude@linux.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com,
jjherne@linux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, jchrist@linux.ibm.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH v1 5/6] vfio/ccw: Add kmap_local_page() for memcpy
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 19:42:45 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220624224245.GC4147@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YrYayPvA7XlCZLQ2@Asurada-Nvidia>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 01:12:56PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > The kmap_local_page() arose because the code doing memcpy had to be
> > updated to go from a struct page to a void * for use with memcpy and
> > the kmap_local_page() is the correct API to use for that.
> >
> > The existing code which casts a pfn to a void * is improper.
>
> Yes.
>
> If I understand everything correctly:
>
> A PFN is not secure enough to promise that the memory is not IO. And
> direct access via memcpy() that only handles CPU memory will crash on
> S390 if the PFN is an IO PFN, as we have to use the memcpy_to/fromio()
> that uses the special S390 IO access instructions. On the other hand,
> a "struct page *" is always a CPU coherent thing that fits memcpy().
>
> Also, casting a PFN to "void *" for memcpy() is not an proper practice,
> kmap_local_page() is the correct API to call here, though S390 doesn't
> use highmem, which means kmap_local_page() is a NOP.
>
> There's a following patch changing the vfio_pin_pages() API to return
> a list of "struct page *" instead of PFNs. It will block any IO memory
> from ever getting into this call path, for such a security purpose. In
> this patch, add kmap_local_page() to prepare for that.
Yes, basically
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-16 23:52 [RFT][PATCH v1 0/6] Update vfio_pin/unpin_pages API Nicolin Chen
2022-06-16 23:52 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 1/6] vfio/ap: Pass in physical address of ind to ap_aqic() Nicolin Chen
2022-06-20 10:00 ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-06-21 21:01 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-16 23:52 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 2/6] vfio/ccw: Only pass in contiguous pages Nicolin Chen
2022-06-16 23:52 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 3/6] vfio: Pass in starting IOVA to vfio_pin/unpin_pages API Nicolin Chen
2022-06-17 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-17 21:57 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-22 1:18 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-16 23:52 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 4/6] vfio: Rename user_iova of vfio_dma_rw() Nicolin Chen
2022-06-16 23:52 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 5/6] vfio/ccw: Add kmap_local_page() for memcpy Nicolin Chen
2022-06-17 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-17 21:58 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-20 2:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-20 6:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-20 15:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-21 21:21 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-24 13:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-24 19:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-24 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-24 20:12 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-24 22:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-06-16 23:52 ` [RFT][PATCH v1 6/6] vfio: Replace phys_pfn with phys_page for vfio_pin_pages() Nicolin Chen
2022-06-17 8:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-17 22:06 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-19 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-19 6:41 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-06-20 3:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-20 5:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-20 6:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-20 15:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-21 21:47 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220624224245.GC4147@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jchrist@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).