From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2A8C433EF for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 13:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232345AbiGFNow (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 09:44:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44766 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229757AbiGFNow (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 09:44:52 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0DA8DEF2; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 06:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 81CAF68AA6; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 15:44:47 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: John Garry Cc: damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] DMA mapping changes for SCSI core Message-ID: <20220706134447.GA23753@lst.de> References: <1656590892-42307-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 02:40:44PM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 30/06/2022 13:08, John Garry wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > Can you please consider picking up this series? A few things to note > beforehand: > > - I changed to only apply the mapping limit to SAS hosts in this version. I > would need a fresh ack from Martin for those SCSI parts, but wanted to make > sure you were ok with it. Yes, I've mostly been waiting for an ACK from Martin. > - Damien had some doubt on updating the shost max_sectors as opposed to the > per-request queue default, but I think he's ok with it - see patch 4/5 I'm fine either way.