Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 1/1] docs: driver-api: virtio: virtio on Linux

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 10:46:43AM +0200, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote:
> >> +It's at this stage that the virtqueues will be allocated and configured
> >> +by calling the appropriate ``virtio_find`` helper function, such as
> >> +virtio_find_single_vq() or virtio_find_vqs(), which will end up
> >> +calling a transport-specific ``find_vqs`` method.
> >> +
> >
> > Looks like the wording at the beginning confuses me, so better say:
> >
> > ---- >8 ----
> > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/virtio/virtio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/virtio/virtio.rst
> > index 07fd2d7c51e689..7947b4ca690efd 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/virtio/virtio.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/virtio/virtio.rst
> > @@ -123,10 +123,10 @@ When the device is registered to the virtio bus the kernel will look
> >  for a driver in the bus that can handle the device and call that
> >  driver's ``probe`` method.
> 
> I think this is a matter of style as well, maybe a native speaker can
> pitch in about the correctness of it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ricardo

I think I agree with this comment.  This seems minor enough so I applied
the patch for now. Bagas would you like to post your suggestion as a patch on
top? Would be appreciated. Thanks!

-- 
MST