From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0ADC004D4 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229584AbjATA2r (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 19:28:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40836 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229540AbjATA2p (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 19:28:45 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B3BA1018 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:28:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id n20-20020a17090aab9400b00229ca6a4636so6679269pjq.0 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:28:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IZAy1Y8poHiv3/DrHCdfFCmw0t4/q9CU42X5LVblr5A=; b=bo7wkN/IPdQVxvTGSFxjsBBqC/EpA4zIw+0kKaMdUq1Ceeo+mcn0OwrlusF6IDbtPY COeHO7uC0iC/l7TK0uwB3XM0HL9dApX34LiilqOFMRqWQTUkOEeg08x5yyYb8yiLK89O SFCMFJJsIpf9NwlZlW+MGLC7boEsAGDj56+EA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=IZAy1Y8poHiv3/DrHCdfFCmw0t4/q9CU42X5LVblr5A=; b=JJe3oneZY2CeUDznOxCeej5eb97LZW8zlp3rvov1o73VfMeG+mjVTF+JG9+K1EBL2j SeN2Ro+BSrH2HS88mv12flt28OIkxUtjmOptHogT3IXo/ERgdfeFetPWPocsVNQwOUGM qidwdZS97T+xjI6Oj4t694rnk59Tp72qFQjMf5wj9D7odH1Y7iVdMFvt8zqL9sQXW9dy RagA00fA+CxcYaAB9yv817qMV4NGjHSdtM278ZGSZvMRXBrojQHeRgqNiNIOWizJvarq z1U7mdZdJHoGCFP+F+gf44Zh2NFbSRunEz7uxTFTBl3cnOAsAreRY8vUAhBX0J20U9Vq 0Z+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqZcH3bd7pkYpYL1wpUApIYLnXzXw2RDWk0tzpOJHGvnVX/x3P4 NTCcwRp9aQq6wwh8iyI/E63VLA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtdx4/yGbslglkhzJkvG1BfbwF5m1Z+ARJ2282gHalN/ZaLh5DyiNEQo2fUbuB+AyrY4JALCw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:11c7:b0:194:58c7:ab79 with SMTP id q7-20020a17090311c700b0019458c7ab79mr16848873plh.63.1674174523771; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:28:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k15-20020a170902d58f00b001947c22185bsm11085080plh.184.2023.01.19.16.28.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:28:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:28:42 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Seth Jenkins Cc: SeongJae Park , Jann Horn , Luis Chamberlain , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Andrew Morton , tangmeng , "Guilherme G. Piccoli" , Tiezhu Yang , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , "Eric W. Biederman" , Arnd Bergmann , Dmitry Vyukov , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Valentin Schneider , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Andrey Konovalov , Vincenzo Frascino , David Gow , "Paul E. McKenney" , Jonathan Corbet , Baolin Wang , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Eric Biggers , Huang Ying , Anton Vorontsov , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Laurent Dufour , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] exit: Put an upper limit on how often we can oops Message-ID: <202301191627.FC1E24ED5@keescook> References: <20221117234328.594699-2-keescook@chromium.org> <20230119201023.4003-1-sj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 03:19:21PM -0500, Seth Jenkins wrote: > > Do you have a plan to backport this into upstream LTS kernels? > > As I understand, the answer is "hopefully yes" with the big > presumption that all stakeholders are on board for the change. There > is *definitely* a plan to *submit* backports to the stable trees, but > ofc it will require some approvals. I've asked for at least v6.1.x (it's a clean cherry-pick). Earlier kernels will need some non-trivial backporting. Is there anyone that would be interested in stepping up to do that? https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202301191532.AEEC765@keescook -Kees -- Kees Cook