From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
To: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: accurate reclaim bandwidth for GRUB
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 22:54:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230509225417.61d36733@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230509224829.2fb547fd@nowhere>
On Tue, 9 May 2023 22:48:29 +0200
luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 9 May 2023 15:29:21 -0400
> Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> wrote:
> [...]
> > > Is this understanding correct?
> > Yes, the above two details are correct. In addition to that, I think
> > the existing equation had a small bug:
> > GRUB paper says, running time is depreciated as
> > "dq = -U dt" where U is running_bw.
> > This is assuming that the whole cpu bandwidth could be reclaimed.
> > But in our case, we cap at Umax. So the equation should be
> > "dq = -(U/Umax) dt"
>
> Yes, this is the approximation I was mentioning... Instead of using a
> division, I approximated it with a different equation using a sum.
Sorry, ignore this comment (and the following); I misinterpreted the
code (and my old notes).
I do not understand why the "max{}" doe not work well, I need to double
think about it.
Luca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-09 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-08 16:08 [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: accurate reclaim bandwidth for GRUB Vineeth Pillai
2023-05-08 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: sched/deadline: Update GRUB description Vineeth Pillai
2023-05-10 8:05 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-05-09 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: accurate reclaim bandwidth for GRUB luca abeni
2023-05-09 19:29 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2023-05-09 20:48 ` luca abeni
2023-05-09 20:54 ` luca abeni [this message]
2023-05-10 3:53 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2023-05-10 7:07 ` luca abeni
2023-05-10 15:50 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2023-05-11 7:37 ` luca abeni
2023-05-11 18:34 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2023-05-11 20:03 ` luca abeni
2023-05-11 20:40 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
2023-05-15 2:56 ` Vineeth Remanan Pillai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230509225417.61d36733@nowhere \
--to=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).