From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC18BC7EE2D for ; Mon, 15 May 2023 09:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240422AbjEOJuR (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2023 05:50:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54198 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239553AbjEOJuD (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2023 05:50:03 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B9A310C3; Mon, 15 May 2023 02:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id BE47A68BFE; Mon, 15 May 2023 11:49:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 11:49:55 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Yajun Deng Cc: corbet@lwn.net, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, paulmck@kernel.org, bp@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, kim.phillips@amd.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, ardb@kernel.org, bhe@redhat.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures Message-ID: <20230515094955.GB23880@lst.de> References: <20230512094210.141540-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230512094210.141540-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org This looks fine to me. Can you please work with Barry to make sure the slight different place of the initcall doesn't break anything for his setup? I doubt it would, but I'd rather have a Tested-by: tag.