Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] sched/deadline: Fix reclaim inaccuracy with SMP

[luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>]

Hi,

sorry for the late reply.

On Mon, 22 May 2023 15:22:52 -0400
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> wrote:
[...]
> > But when I use
> >         dq = -(max{u_i, (Umax - Uinact - Uextra)} / Umax) * dt
> > everything works as expected, the 4 tasks reclaim 95% of the CPU
> > time and my shell is still active...
> > (so, I cannot reproduce the starvation issue with this equation)
> >  
> Sorry about this confusion, yes you are right, there is no stall with
> this equation. The only issue is the lesser reclaim when the load is
> less and tasks have different bandwidth requirements.
> 
> > So, I now think the second one is the correct equation to be used.
> >  
> Thanks for confirming.
> 
> I think it probably makes sense to get the fix for the equation to go
> in as a first step and then we can investigate more about the second
> issue (less reclaiming with less load and different bandwidth) and
> fix it separately. What do you think?

I fully agree. If you split this change in a first patch, IMHO it
can be applied.

BTW, I tried changing the equation without introducing div64, and it
seems to me that it works well... So, if removing the bw_ratio
approximation is needed, I think you can do it in a second patch (so,
the first patch changes the reclaiming equation, and the second one
introduces div64)


			Thanks,
				Luca

> I shall send the next iteration
> with the fix for the equation alone if its okay with you.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vineeth