linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>,
	Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@google.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] kunit: Add kunit_add_action() to defer a call until test exit
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 12:21:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230525042133.212534-1-davidgow@google.com> (raw)

Many uses of the KUnit resource system are intended to simply defer
calling a function until the test exits (be it due to success or
failure). The existing kunit_alloc_resource() function is often used for
this, but was awkward to use (requiring passing NULL init functions, etc),
and returned a resource without incrementing its reference count, which
-- while okay for this use-case -- could cause problems in others.

Instead, introduce a simple kunit_add_action() API: a simple function
(returning nothing, accepting a single void* argument) can be scheduled
to be called when the test exits. Deferred actions are called in the
opposite order to that which they were registered.

This mimics the devres API, devm_add_action(), and also provides
kunit_remove_action(), to cancel a deferred action, and
kunit_release_action() to trigger one early.

This is implemented as a resource under the hood, so the ordering
between resource cleanup and deferred functions is maintained.

Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---

No changes since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230518083849.2631178-1-davidgow@google.com/

Changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230421084226.2278282-2-davidgow@google.com/
- Some small documentation updates (Thanks Daniel)
- Reinstate a typedef for the action function.
  - This time, it's called kunit_action_t
  - Thanks Maxime!

Changes since RFC v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230331080411.981038-2-davidgow@google.com/
- Got rid of internal_gfp
  - everything uses GFP_KERNEL now
  - This includes kunit_kzalloc() and friends, which still allocate the
    returned memory with the provided GFP, but use GFP_KERNEL for
    internal bookkeeping data.
  - Thanks Maxime & Benjamin!
- Got rid of cancellation tokens.
  - kunit_add_action() now returns 0 on success, otherwise an error
  - Note that this can quite easily lead to a memory leak, so look at
    kunit_add_action_or_reset()
  - Thanks Maxime & Benjamin!
- Added kunit_add_action_or_reset
  - Matches devm_add_action_or_reset()
  - Returns 0 on success.
  - Thanks Maxime & Benjamin!
- Got rid of the kunit_defer_func_t typedef.
  - I liked it, but it is probably pushing the boundaries of kernel
    style.
  - Use (void (*)(void *)) instead.

Changes since RFC v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230325043104.3761770-2-davidgow@google.com/
- Rename functions to better match the devm_* APIs. (Thanks Maxime)
- Embed the kunit_resource in struct kunit_action_ctx to avoid an extra
  allocation (Thanks Benjamin)
- Use 'struct kunit_action_ctx' as the type for cancellation tokens
  (Thanks Benjamin)
- Add tests.


---
 include/kunit/resource.h | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/kunit/kunit-test.c   | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 lib/kunit/resource.c     | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/kunit/resource.h b/include/kunit/resource.h
index c0d88b318e90..b64eb783b1bc 100644
--- a/include/kunit/resource.h
+++ b/include/kunit/resource.h
@@ -387,4 +387,96 @@ static inline int kunit_destroy_named_resource(struct kunit *test,
  */
 void kunit_remove_resource(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_resource *res);
 
+/* A 'deferred action' function to be used with kunit_add_action. */
+typedef void (kunit_action_t)(void *);
+
+/**
+ * kunit_add_action() - Call a function when the test ends.
+ * @test: Test case to associate the action with.
+ * @func: The function to run on test exit
+ * @ctx: Data passed into @func
+ *
+ * Defer the execution of a function until the test exits, either normally or
+ * due to a failure.  @ctx is passed as additional context. All functions
+ * registered with kunit_add_action() will execute in the opposite order to that
+ * they were registered in.
+ *
+ * This is useful for cleaning up allocated memory and resources, as these
+ * functions are called even if the test aborts early due to, e.g., a failed
+ * assertion.
+ *
+ * See also: devm_add_action() for the devres equivalent.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *   0 on success, an error if the action could not be deferred.
+ */
+int kunit_add_action(struct kunit *test, kunit_action_t *action, void *ctx);
+
+/**
+ * kunit_add_action_or_reset() - Call a function when the test ends.
+ * @test: Test case to associate the action with.
+ * @func: The function to run on test exit
+ * @ctx: Data passed into @func
+ *
+ * Defer the execution of a function until the test exits, either normally or
+ * due to a failure.  @ctx is passed as additional context. All functions
+ * registered with kunit_add_action() will execute in the opposite order to that
+ * they were registered in.
+ *
+ * This is useful for cleaning up allocated memory and resources, as these
+ * functions are called even if the test aborts early due to, e.g., a failed
+ * assertion.
+ *
+ * If the action cannot be created (e.g., due to the system being out of memory),
+ * then action(ctx) will be called immediately, and an error will be returned.
+ *
+ * See also: devm_add_action_or_reset() for the devres equivalent.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *   0 on success, an error if the action could not be deferred.
+ */
+int kunit_add_action_or_reset(struct kunit *test, kunit_action_t *action,
+			      void *ctx);
+
+/**
+ * kunit_remove_action() - Cancel a matching deferred action.
+ * @test: Test case the action is associated with.
+ * @func: The deferred function to cancel.
+ * @ctx: The context passed to the deferred function to trigger.
+ *
+ * Prevent an action deferred via kunit_add_action() from executing when the
+ * test terminates.
+ *
+ * If the function/context pair was deferred multiple times, only the most
+ * recent one will be cancelled.
+ *
+ * See also: devm_remove_action() for the devres equivalent.
+ */
+void kunit_remove_action(struct kunit *test,
+			 kunit_action_t *action,
+			 void *ctx);
+
+/**
+ * kunit_release_action() - Run a matching action call immediately.
+ * @test: Test case the action is associated with.
+ * @func: The deferred function to trigger.
+ * @ctx: The context passed to the deferred function to trigger.
+ *
+ * Execute a function deferred via kunit_add_action()) immediately, rather than
+ * when the test ends.
+ *
+ * If the function/context pair was deferred multiple times, it will only be
+ * executed once here. The most recent deferral will no longer execute when
+ * the test ends.
+ *
+ * kunit_release_action(test, func, ctx);
+ * is equivalent to
+ * func(ctx);
+ * kunit_remove_action(test, func, ctx);
+ *
+ * See also: devm_release_action() for the devres equivalent.
+ */
+void kunit_release_action(struct kunit *test,
+			  kunit_action_t *action,
+			  void *ctx);
 #endif /* _KUNIT_RESOURCE_H */
diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
index 42e44caa1bdd..83d8e90ca7a2 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ struct kunit_test_resource_context {
 	struct kunit test;
 	bool is_resource_initialized;
 	int allocate_order[2];
-	int free_order[2];
+	int free_order[4];
 };
 
 static int fake_resource_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context)
@@ -403,6 +403,88 @@ static void kunit_resource_test_named(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&test->resources));
 }
 
+static void increment_int(void *ctx)
+{
+	int *i = (int *)ctx;
+	(*i)++;
+}
+
+static void kunit_resource_test_action(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int num_actions = 0;
+
+	kunit_add_action(test, increment_int, &num_actions);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, num_actions, 0);
+	kunit_cleanup(test);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, num_actions, 1);
+
+	/* Once we've cleaned up, the action queue is empty. */
+	kunit_cleanup(test);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, num_actions, 1);
+
+	/* Check the same function can be deferred multiple times. */
+	kunit_add_action(test, increment_int, &num_actions);
+	kunit_add_action(test, increment_int, &num_actions);
+	kunit_cleanup(test);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, num_actions, 3);
+}
+static void kunit_resource_test_remove_action(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int num_actions = 0;
+
+	kunit_add_action(test, increment_int, &num_actions);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, num_actions, 0);
+
+	kunit_remove_action(test, increment_int, &num_actions);
+	kunit_cleanup(test);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, num_actions, 0);
+}
+static void kunit_resource_test_release_action(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int num_actions = 0;
+
+	kunit_add_action(test, increment_int, &num_actions);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, num_actions, 0);
+	/* Runs immediately on trigger. */
+	kunit_release_action(test, increment_int, &num_actions);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, num_actions, 1);
+
+	/* Doesn't run again on test exit. */
+	kunit_cleanup(test);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, num_actions, 1);
+}
+static void action_order_1(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct kunit_test_resource_context *res_ctx = (struct kunit_test_resource_context *)ctx;
+
+	KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(res_ctx, free_order, 1);
+	kunit_log(KERN_INFO, current->kunit_test, "action_order_1");
+}
+static void action_order_2(void *ctx)
+{
+	struct kunit_test_resource_context *res_ctx = (struct kunit_test_resource_context *)ctx;
+
+	KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(res_ctx, free_order, 2);
+	kunit_log(KERN_INFO, current->kunit_test, "action_order_2");
+}
+static void kunit_resource_test_action_ordering(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
+
+	kunit_add_action(test, action_order_1, ctx);
+	kunit_add_action(test, action_order_2, ctx);
+	kunit_add_action(test, action_order_1, ctx);
+	kunit_add_action(test, action_order_2, ctx);
+	kunit_remove_action(test, action_order_1, ctx);
+	kunit_release_action(test, action_order_2, ctx);
+	kunit_cleanup(test);
+
+	/* [2 is triggered] [2], [(1 is cancelled)] [1] */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->free_order[0], 2);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->free_order[1], 2);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->free_order[2], 1);
+}
+
 static int kunit_resource_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx =
@@ -434,6 +516,10 @@ static struct kunit_case kunit_resource_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_proper_free_ordering),
 	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_static),
 	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_named),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_action),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_remove_action),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_release_action),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_action_ordering),
 	{}
 };
 
diff --git a/lib/kunit/resource.c b/lib/kunit/resource.c
index c414df922f34..f0209252b179 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/resource.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/resource.c
@@ -77,3 +77,102 @@ int kunit_destroy_resource(struct kunit *test, kunit_resource_match_t match,
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_destroy_resource);
+
+struct kunit_action_ctx {
+	struct kunit_resource res;
+	kunit_action_t *func;
+	void *ctx;
+};
+
+static void __kunit_action_free(struct kunit_resource *res)
+{
+	struct kunit_action_ctx *action_ctx = container_of(res, struct kunit_action_ctx, res);
+
+	action_ctx->func(action_ctx->ctx);
+}
+
+
+int kunit_add_action(struct kunit *test, void (*action)(void *), void *ctx)
+{
+	struct kunit_action_ctx *action_ctx;
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL_MSG(test, action, "Tried to action a NULL function!");
+
+	action_ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*action_ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!action_ctx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	action_ctx->func = action;
+	action_ctx->ctx = ctx;
+
+	action_ctx->res.should_kfree = true;
+	/* As init is NULL, this cannot fail. */
+	__kunit_add_resource(test, NULL, __kunit_action_free, &action_ctx->res, action_ctx);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_add_action);
+
+int kunit_add_action_or_reset(struct kunit *test, void (*action)(void *),
+			      void *ctx)
+{
+	int res = kunit_add_action(test, action, ctx);
+
+	if (res)
+		action(ctx);
+	return res;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_add_action_or_reset);
+
+static bool __kunit_action_match(struct kunit *test,
+				struct kunit_resource *res, void *match_data)
+{
+	struct kunit_action_ctx *match_ctx = (struct kunit_action_ctx *)match_data;
+	struct kunit_action_ctx *res_ctx = container_of(res, struct kunit_action_ctx, res);
+
+	/* Make sure this is a free function. */
+	if (res->free != __kunit_action_free)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Both the function and context data should match. */
+	return (match_ctx->func == res_ctx->func) && (match_ctx->ctx == res_ctx->ctx);
+}
+
+void kunit_remove_action(struct kunit *test,
+			kunit_action_t *action,
+			void *ctx)
+{
+	struct kunit_action_ctx match_ctx;
+	struct kunit_resource *res;
+
+	match_ctx.func = action;
+	match_ctx.ctx = ctx;
+
+	res = kunit_find_resource(test, __kunit_action_match, &match_ctx);
+	if (res) {
+		/* Remove the free function so we don't run the action. */
+		res->free = NULL;
+		kunit_remove_resource(test, res);
+		kunit_put_resource(res);
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_remove_action);
+
+void kunit_release_action(struct kunit *test,
+			 kunit_action_t *action,
+			 void *ctx)
+{
+	struct kunit_action_ctx match_ctx;
+	struct kunit_resource *res;
+
+	match_ctx.func = action;
+	match_ctx.ctx = ctx;
+
+	res = kunit_find_resource(test, __kunit_action_match, &match_ctx);
+	if (res) {
+		kunit_remove_resource(test, res);
+		/* We have to put() this here, else free won't be called. */
+		kunit_put_resource(res);
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_release_action);
-- 
2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2023-05-25  4:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-25  4:21 David Gow [this message]
2023-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] kunit: executor_test: Use kunit_add_action() David Gow
2023-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] kunit: kmalloc_array: " David Gow
2023-05-25  4:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Documentation: kunit: Add usage notes for kunit_add_action() David Gow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230525042133.212534-1-davidgow@google.com \
    --to=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=benjamin.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=sadiyakazi@google.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).