From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: Add support for rootwait timeout parameter
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 14:39:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230530-anziehen-brokkoli-4c1365e888ea@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZdPi_WE7eegcn3V+7tUsJL2GoGottz2fGY14tkmqG9Tgdbhg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Loic Poulain wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 11:45, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 03:07:16PM +0200, Loic Poulain wrote:
> > > Add an optional timeout arg to 'rootwait' as the maximum time in
> > > seconds to wait for the root device to show up before attempting
> > > forced mount of the root filesystem.
> > >
> > > This can be helpful to force boot failure and restart in case the
> > > root device does not show up in time, allowing the bootloader to
> > > take any appropriate measures (e.g. recovery, A/B switch, retry...).
> > >
> > > In success case, mounting happens as soon as the root device is ready,
> > > contrary to the existing 'rootdelay' parameter (unconditional delay).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> >
> > Not terribly opposed and not terribly convinced yet.
> > So, we have rootdelay= with a timeout parameter that allows to specify a
> > delay before attempting to mount the root device. And we have rootwait
> > currently as an indefinite wait. Adding a timeout for rootwait doesn't
> > seem crazy and is backwards compatible. But there's no mention of any
> > concrete users or use-case for this which is usually preferable. If this
> > is just "could be useful for someone eventually" it's way less desirable
> > to merge this than when it's "here's a/multiple user/users"... So I
> > would love to see a use-case described here.
>
> I can integrate the following use case into a v2 if you think it makes sense:
Yes, please.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-30 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-26 13:07 [PATCH] init: Add support for rootwait timeout parameter Loic Poulain
2023-05-30 9:45 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-30 11:23 ` Loic Poulain
2023-05-30 12:39 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-05-30 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-30 15:43 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-31 5:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31 7:48 ` Christian Brauner
2023-05-31 7:57 ` Loic Poulain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230530-anziehen-brokkoli-4c1365e888ea@brauner \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox