From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA30EB64DA for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 11:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231322AbjGTLyy (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:54:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50826 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231336AbjGTLys (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:54:48 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE55C26BB; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 04:54:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 554AB6732D; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 13:54:08 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Yajun Deng Cc: Christoph Hellwig , corbet@lwn.net, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, kim.phillips@amd.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dma-contiguous: support numa CMA for specified node Message-ID: <20230720115408.GA13114@lst.de> References: <20230720082517.GA7057@lst.de> <20230712074758.1133272-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev> <25942dafbc7f52488a30c807b6322109539442cf@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25942dafbc7f52488a30c807b6322109539442cf@linux.dev> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 08:47:37AM +0000, Yajun Deng wrote: > It's based on linux-next tree. > > This patch should be after my other patch in linux-next tree. > a960925a6b23("dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures"). Where did this land? dma patches really should be going through the DMA tree..