From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD570C001DE for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 21:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229445AbjGYVtD (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:49:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40638 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230075AbjGYVtC (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:49:02 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6D5C1FF0; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B907616A3; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 21:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85582C433C7; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 21:48:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1690321739; bh=giBk76Wu2CNxIKQ+bWSMybNrR4Xwdbrb7bfqe39jKGY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UTmiPxbosiW2nQ1ygwQpI0u0A4jO+VTQXLpQm8gykr4mpHK3Nbw0GxqExmFvJhKuo K7gyCPZSlS34qRrp6CqEERKzht3NHErcrghZVkiqAvTGB5YnBfjKD8TDu64naG0m9+ 0WdQ5D2fH9aiZ+BTkjukoVJeYUlPba/5saeEmpjCOAsqR3mOdVd7nB1nOdM13z4RRk a2zClPLVbB77kQa2iQYXWUUkva6q41jzfJKrKzmfPn06MF0U1N/ptqUc5T7KicqYLW HttCu5Irc4LxKIo1jgHA2dktF2NeeoDppcsSg5e2rqsipXR6/4h6hFmSxBtDRHsxKL RJcaZWEpIopkQ== Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 22:48:54 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Chen Jiahao Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com, guoren@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de, bjorn@rivosinc.com, alex@ghiti.fr, akpm@linux-foundation.org, atishp@rivosinc.com, bhe@redhat.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, horms@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv Message-ID: <20230725-judiciary-auction-ef50be622175@spud> References: <20230725214413.2488159-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tppZMEkMOmCgNS1D" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230725214413.2488159-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org --tppZMEkMOmCgNS1D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hey, Your $subject says -next, but the patch failed to apply to riscv/for-next. What was the base for this patchset? Thanks, Conor. --tppZMEkMOmCgNS1D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZMBDRgAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0sf8AP4uEgceSAb5yQVnixLMnccgleBSjQoafJCHM7CMGvRtRQEA9nabe9G4Ghc/ Xbr6ZvQqp/XMXGdRmePLtK0/PKv2pQs= =nSay -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tppZMEkMOmCgNS1D--