From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F98C001E0 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 06:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231986AbjGZGqL (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 02:46:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59554 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230313AbjGZGp5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 02:45:57 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1122705; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 23:45:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1690353953; x=1721889953; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=gDNCsCsO1KbGhAHJNmEBa1gkvZGzH8c3upBGSOQlNOA=; b=F62RQVXUzDmoaoFbYR32xfCLGv/rmnK/AVb2eXGLxODDGkPKOLuigRzz EXyNSGQWvtQfpLymX7GHE0WUDyvj3cZYaBY79fgXY7zCJ6boZtMVHWe1V KARVT4ZyAJmD27dXOEUMFcHCFy4IFK2q5VVfNEDqC90IfUfHsXWp3FR46 mxsdYCysbIY93uFMbEI4bk5+JUWtd1lFZq5FW9yDUCdmcvNdjTY591JBl BJwQQXLM/3q1d7cVW83UGVQAlv06reRGGOgQPAUzDwuhHtNSTofFfeLTn em/cIzJtcfeOaGNV7IVLedwSVDpUDpFWxZAMZIfdc/+JtEEcnsSfKK2rn Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,231,1684825200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="163253302" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 25 Jul 2023 23:45:52 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 23:45:45 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 23:45:43 -0700 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:45:08 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: "chenjiahao (C)" CC: Conor Dooley , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv Message-ID: <20230726-affix-employed-319aada685e7@wendy> References: <20230725214413.2488159-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com> <20230725-judiciary-auction-ef50be622175@spud> <96245a6f-cff1-9f2a-1217-4109d9a19291@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJOap9vmU2OvA6x9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <96245a6f-cff1-9f2a-1217-4109d9a19291@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org --IJOap9vmU2OvA6x9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:20:00AM +0800, chenjiahao (C) wrote: >=20 > On 2023/7/26 5:48, Conor Dooley wrote: > > Hey, > >=20 > > Your $subject says -next, but the patch failed to apply to > > riscv/for-next. What was the base for this patchset? > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Conor. >=20 > Hi, >=20 > My patchset was tested on current linux-next HEAD > (commit ID: 1e25dd777248, tag: next-20230725) and > it seems all ok. > Could you try applying with the base above, or > is there any problem with that base? There's some difference between linux-next and riscv/for-next that prevents the patchwork automation from applying the patches. --IJOap9vmU2OvA6x9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHQEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZMDA5QAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0tKwAP9sgmoHHSgRVm0XXcQYF7qM3+usgvdzT0xxSm4kXVozZgD3WZsTiicAAJla IpwJI7hV57KDX7zRXzg2yr8IZCNjDg== =VfGq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJOap9vmU2OvA6x9--