linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: guoren@kernel.org
To: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, anup@brainfault.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
	palmer@rivosinc.com, longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com,
	bjorn@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com,
	keescook@chromium.org, greentime.hu@sifive.com,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com, jszhang@kernel.org, wefu@redhat.com,
	wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V10 02/19] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Move into ticket_spinlock.h
Date: Wed,  2 Aug 2023 12:46:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230802164701.192791-3-guoren@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230802164701.192791-1-guoren@kernel.org>

From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>

Move ticket-lock definition into an independent file. This is the
preparation for the next combo spinlock of riscv.

Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
---
 include/asm-generic/spinlock.h        |  87 +---------------------
 include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
index 4773334ee638..970590baf61b 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
@@ -1,94 +1,9 @@
 /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
 
-/*
- * 'Generic' ticket-lock implementation.
- *
- * It relies on atomic_fetch_add() having well defined forward progress
- * guarantees under contention. If your architecture cannot provide this, stick
- * to a test-and-set lock.
- *
- * It also relies on atomic_fetch_add() being safe vs smp_store_release() on a
- * sub-word of the value. This is generally true for anything LL/SC although
- * you'd be hard pressed to find anything useful in architecture specifications
- * about this. If your architecture cannot do this you might be better off with
- * a test-and-set.
- *
- * It further assumes atomic_*_release() + atomic_*_acquire() is RCpc and hence
- * uses atomic_fetch_add() which is RCsc to create an RCsc hot path, along with
- * a full fence after the spin to upgrade the otherwise-RCpc
- * atomic_cond_read_acquire().
- *
- * The implementation uses smp_cond_load_acquire() to spin, so if the
- * architecture has WFE like instructions to sleep instead of poll for word
- * modifications be sure to implement that (see ARM64 for example).
- *
- */
-
 #ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H
 #define __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H
 
-#include <linux/atomic.h>
-#include <asm-generic/spinlock_types.h>
-
-static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-	u32 val = atomic_fetch_add(1<<16, &lock->val);
-	u16 ticket = val >> 16;
-
-	if (ticket == (u16)val)
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * atomic_cond_read_acquire() is RCpc, but rather than defining a
-	 * custom cond_read_rcsc() here we just emit a full fence.  We only
-	 * need the prior reads before subsequent writes ordering from
-	 * smb_mb(), but as atomic_cond_read_acquire() just emits reads and we
-	 * have no outstanding writes due to the atomic_fetch_add() the extra
-	 * orderings are free.
-	 */
-	atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, ticket == (u16)VAL);
-	smp_mb();
-}
-
-static __always_inline bool arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-	u32 old = atomic_read(&lock->val);
-
-	if ((old >> 16) != (old & 0xffff))
-		return false;
-
-	return atomic_try_cmpxchg(&lock->val, &old, old + (1<<16)); /* SC, for RCsc */
-}
-
-static __always_inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-	u16 *ptr = (u16 *)lock + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
-	u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
-
-	smp_store_release(ptr, (u16)val + 1);
-}
-
-static __always_inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
-{
-	u32 val = lock.val.counter;
-
-	return ((val >> 16) == (val & 0xffff));
-}
-
-static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-	arch_spinlock_t val = READ_ONCE(*lock);
-
-	return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(val);
-}
-
-static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-	u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
-
-	return (s16)((val >> 16) - (val & 0xffff)) > 1;
-}
-
+#include <asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h>
 #include <asm/qrwlock.h>
 
 #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H */
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..cfcff22b37b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+
+/*
+ * 'Generic' ticket-lock implementation.
+ *
+ * It relies on atomic_fetch_add() having well defined forward progress
+ * guarantees under contention. If your architecture cannot provide this, stick
+ * to a test-and-set lock.
+ *
+ * It also relies on atomic_fetch_add() being safe vs smp_store_release() on a
+ * sub-word of the value. This is generally true for anything LL/SC although
+ * you'd be hard pressed to find anything useful in architecture specifications
+ * about this. If your architecture cannot do this you might be better off with
+ * a test-and-set.
+ *
+ * It further assumes atomic_*_release() + atomic_*_acquire() is RCpc and hence
+ * uses atomic_fetch_add() which is RCsc to create an RCsc hot path, along with
+ * a full fence after the spin to upgrade the otherwise-RCpc
+ * atomic_cond_read_acquire().
+ *
+ * The implementation uses smp_cond_load_acquire() to spin, so if the
+ * architecture has WFE like instructions to sleep instead of poll for word
+ * modifications be sure to implement that (see ARM64 for example).
+ *
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H
+#define __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H
+
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <asm-generic/spinlock_types.h>
+
+static __always_inline void ticket_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	u32 val = atomic_fetch_add(1<<16, &lock->val);
+	u16 ticket = val >> 16;
+
+	if (ticket == (u16)val)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * atomic_cond_read_acquire() is RCpc, but rather than defining a
+	 * custom cond_read_rcsc() here we just emit a full fence.  We only
+	 * need the prior reads before subsequent writes ordering from
+	 * smb_mb(), but as atomic_cond_read_acquire() just emits reads and we
+	 * have no outstanding writes due to the atomic_fetch_add() the extra
+	 * orderings are free.
+	 */
+	atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, ticket == (u16)VAL);
+	smp_mb();
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool ticket_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	u32 old = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+
+	if ((old >> 16) != (old & 0xffff))
+		return false;
+
+	return atomic_try_cmpxchg(&lock->val, &old, old + (1<<16)); /* SC, for RCsc */
+}
+
+static __always_inline void ticket_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	u16 *ptr = (u16 *)lock + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN);
+	u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+
+	smp_store_release(ptr, (u16)val + 1);
+}
+
+static __always_inline int ticket_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
+{
+	u32 val = lock.val.counter;
+
+	return ((val >> 16) == (val & 0xffff));
+}
+
+static __always_inline int ticket_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	arch_spinlock_t val = READ_ONCE(*lock);
+
+	return !ticket_spin_value_unlocked(val);
+}
+
+static __always_inline int ticket_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+
+	return (s16)((val >> 16) - (val & 0xffff)) > 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Remapping spinlock architecture specific functions to the corresponding
+ * ticket spinlock functions.
+ */
+#define arch_spin_is_locked(l)		ticket_spin_is_locked(l)
+#define arch_spin_is_contended(l)	ticket_spin_is_contended(l)
+#define arch_spin_value_unlocked(l)	ticket_spin_value_unlocked(l)
+#define arch_spin_lock(l)		ticket_spin_lock(l)
+#define arch_spin_trylock(l)		ticket_spin_trylock(l)
+#define arch_spin_unlock(l)		ticket_spin_unlock(l)
+
+#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H */
-- 
2.36.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-02 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-02 16:46 [PATCH V10 00/19] riscv: Add Native/Paravirt/CNA qspinlock support guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 01/19] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Reuse arch_spinlock_t of qspinlock guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` guoren [this message]
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 03/19] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Add ERRATA_THEAD_WRITE_ONCE fixup guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 04/19] riscv: qspinlock: Add basic queued_spinlock support guoren
2023-08-11 19:34   ` Waiman Long
2023-08-12  0:18     ` Guo Ren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 05/19] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce combo spinlock guoren
2023-08-11 19:51   ` Waiman Long
2023-08-12  0:22     ` Guo Ren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 06/19] riscv: qspinlock: Allow force qspinlock from the command line guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 07/19] riscv: qspinlock: errata: Introduce ERRATA_THEAD_QSPINLOCK guoren
2023-08-04  9:05   ` Conor Dooley
2023-08-04  9:53     ` Guo Ren
2023-08-04 10:06       ` Conor Dooley
2023-08-05  1:28         ` Guo Ren
2023-08-07  5:23   ` Stefan O'Rear
2023-08-08  2:12     ` Guo Ren
2023-09-13 18:54     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-09-13 19:32       ` Waiman Long
2023-09-14  3:31       ` Guo Ren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 08/19] riscv: qspinlock: Use new static key for controlling call of virt_spin_lock() guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 09/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add paravirt qspinlock skeleton guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 10/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: KVM: " guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 11/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: KVM: Implement kvm_sbi_ext_pvlock_kick_cpu() guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 12/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add nopvspin kernel parameter guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 13/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Remove unnecessary definitions of cmpxchg & xchg guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 14/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add xchg8 & cmpxchg_small support guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 15/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add SBI implementation guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 16/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add kconfig entry guoren
2023-08-02 16:46 ` [PATCH V10 17/19] RISC-V: paravirt: pvqspinlock: Add trace point for pv_kick/wait guoren
2023-08-02 16:47 ` [PATCH V10 18/19] locking/qspinlock: Move pv_ops into x86 directory guoren
2023-08-11 20:42   ` Waiman Long
2023-08-12  0:24     ` Guo Ren
2023-08-12  0:47       ` Waiman Long
2023-08-02 16:47 ` [PATCH V10 19/19] locking/qspinlock: riscv: Add Compact NUMA-aware lock support guoren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230802164701.192791-3-guoren@kernel.org \
    --to=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
    --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wefu@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=xiaoguang.xing@sophgo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).