From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B57C41513 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 10:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229989AbjHDKWY (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2023 06:22:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36834 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229925AbjHDKWX (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2023 06:22:23 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 530F530F4; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 03:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A1F7D68AA6; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 12:22:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 12:22:18 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: kernel test robot , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION fb4327106e5250ee360d0d8b056c1eef7eeb9a98 Message-ID: <20230804102218.GD23274@lst.de> References: <202308040141.gUjtZ32J-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 09:02:29PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I think something like this would fix it. Jens? Christoph? > > +++ b/fs/romfs/Kconfig > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > config ROMFS_FS > tristate "ROM file system support" > depends on BLOCK || MTD > + select BUFFER_HEAD > help > This is a very small read-only file system mainly intended for > initial ram disks of installation disks, but it could be used for > > romfs has a few options and I spent no time looking at this closely; > maybe not every version of romfs needs buffer heads. It only needs buffer_heads for the block based path. I'll send a patch for it.