From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCA7C3DA66 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 01:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239016AbjHXBUj (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:20:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39254 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239068AbjHXBUg (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:20:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6587DB for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 18:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-569deb93999so2711526a12.2 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 18:20:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1692840032; x=1693444832; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=s+YJjfTJ2CkuC+9NB6jQl7KJU8EcbLSznIZ1SQdS0Ww=; b=RZICqqKsIMzwKfA2Ueox9ribDm0pr/+dwRryfn2hU2S8m0nmU3aNn4IO0ZhX0BXLDJ yr8F+ynlshV+pedCIvdzukN4AwNiUuomEvmtbqILCrEKgOqVrVz7CmUbuizI4z0aY/Gu PVdS/6daQkW5nw603RNSDx+U0plzgmEtdmrDI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692840032; x=1693444832; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=s+YJjfTJ2CkuC+9NB6jQl7KJU8EcbLSznIZ1SQdS0Ww=; b=brFH/e2VZMJ3AbbrceKDi2H4LIOci4DlH716VnN34eXAvEqtEZTWIGo2R8NdsoNQqY sXGxCN+BGKymqlKZugjNvsjXIw+OcTVWbdbnYaGYUS+Gbw/Tw1R4bMN1kYrwgfliS3bc G2kmV7yjXTdFszR3yiVah4RSpS0Xw4a6Hjo8X+Gqyrnbx2saw6dqHPeisIfJQbSxbH3F G5yqvUI5nvh39xaEXsFkVlafpvpbtCYV6kaY1WmKUlxLuPXSf5faVV7jgx2agC32gw4D 205c3TlWFdOQ3yJjA6LWfe60qATluoMb0tXDywkaW05estOZxnVETlctdJmfEngbFcAv qhfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy7kWTG13aPWOphYgIVl+BPhuwiFKe1q7s1kqRnllV01xwF4S6q N6pV38ANrdn+nLNXCtTsXikKoQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHAcjLDuiJWXzPmDLQ/QUBMiQMCiXx6OhH0ZfSbdOPcNx64pyF/2QMK8CXZTvIfo5LYo/kDYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:1046:b0:137:a9d7:de12 with SMTP id gt6-20020a056a20104600b00137a9d7de12mr11688917pzc.59.1692840032202; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 18:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (KD124209188001.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp. [124.209.188.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g12-20020a1709026b4c00b001bdb167f6ebsm11504470plt.94.2023.08.23.18.20.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 23 Aug 2023 18:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 10:20:27 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Ying Sun , Jesse T , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Nicolas Schier , Jonathan Corbet , Tomasz Figa , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] kconfig: introduce listunknownconfig Message-ID: <20230824012027.GD3913@google.com> References: <20230817012007.131868-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org> <20230820024519.GK907732@google.com> <20230820072119.GM907732@google.com> <20230820073332.GN907732@google.com> <20230822061203.GA610023@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On (23/08/24 10:00), Masahiro Yamada wrote: > For the MFD_RK808 case particularly, > I believe Kconfig showed MFD_RK8XX_I2C > as a new option. I think there were some other unmet dependencies for MFD_RK8XX_I2C and I don't think the new config was shown. But even if it was, we still would have no idea that this meant "MFD_RK808 is not available anymore and the corresponding code won't get compiled". So the "this is not recognized anymore" is still needed and is quite helpful. Would you be OK with "list missing" being a warning (not a terminal condition)?