From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F88DDDC; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 01:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708048490; cv=none; b=jY4OScmujOMX71O3VemLjBZlWHrLLnfhOJb1USqMjq0th0+NHSqn1G56qoOm5y+DW+QxduAYPmj8TeUvRAKUbe4q0hPE8cTJD2D9BudaQH788WGaK7DzWzbbbuGsDBC17EEFzOH3c8ux/tx/IDNib5kZUU/8d0WWHLp6nXVsmLA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708048490; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B0BsOsgqeWZMYS+uSGOcCu0eCAs37Yp+bwFNHbFSqDw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ic2Xr2+uJMrh0ylPdR+PouoXdtLyoBqGm/LX2VK8etnM98zRvpc4NIwNVyf9o8+tjXH9Vm3wNiG9c3wjQbbSP8Uljom9ukvxQdbtAocXJmv7LGWMtkEW0Jk1qFA6Lo6AhVtsDrFZcgNnunvUkkmU5abyy+PtgWx5U/C+2jDkyzg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=emKjrbww; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="emKjrbww" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708048488; x=1739584488; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=B0BsOsgqeWZMYS+uSGOcCu0eCAs37Yp+bwFNHbFSqDw=; b=emKjrbwwOvp7I7nrxtNGZh6QZK55mYjlkG8V1ms0GfqxD9IGrp6w1O50 eyuNaPXF4NFTD1jlCrVmM28SyaKaAsUJrf2wJahnt+In+joi1LRc17LjP azUc0gGFdqzfpZWxvG3YI4HRTKsGJ3up2eL/+pDnDG9U1MRAJoCS8k4oT UiRBb0Xhd+L5I7s+ZzoaaUdtyzKGkGx49yt1rAJWiE0nivcaDXHtON111 oC9MpAc4eqo7W0wZx9Ci/za/V8ssCQPgRxpQpOAYZhXwJ5VCTma1jyIDk HTvuZ7gfjvAFpJEJe9aQYWssxW9YrpBfiRm3UdP6fEaVd3Tq1kAZFh1eZ A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10985"; a="2026587" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,163,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="2026587" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2024 17:54:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,163,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="3793993" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 3c78fa4d504c) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa010.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2024 17:54:38 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 3c78fa4d504c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ranQx-0000w1-1c; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 01:54:35 +0000 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 09:53:10 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Petr Tesarik , Jonathan Corbet , David Kaplan , Larry Dewey , Elena Reshetova , Carlos Bilbao , "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" , Andrew Morton , Randy Dunlap , Petr Mladek , "Paul E. McKenney" , Eric DeVolder , Marc =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aur=E8le?= La France , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Nhat Pham , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Christian Brauner (Microsoft)" , Douglas Anderson , Luis Chamberlain , Guenter Roeck , Mike Christie , Kent Overstreet , Maninder Singh , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , open list Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , Roberto Sassu , petr@tesarici.cz, Petr Tesarik Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] sbm: SandBox Mode KUnit test suite Message-ID: <202402160907.r0qgAoRs-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240214113035.2117-5-petrtesarik@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240214113035.2117-5-petrtesarik@huaweicloud.com> Hi Petr, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.8-rc4 next-20240215] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Petr-Tesarik/sbm-SandBox-Mode-core-data-types-and-functions/20240214-193528 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240214113035.2117-5-petrtesarik%40huaweicloud.com patch subject: [PATCH v1 4/5] sbm: SandBox Mode KUnit test suite config: mips-randconfig-r121-20240215 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240216/202402160907.r0qgAoRs-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240216/202402160907.r0qgAoRs-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402160907.r0qgAoRs-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> kernel/sbm_test.c:300:13: sparse: sparse: symbol 'static_bss' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/static_bss +300 kernel/sbm_test.c 293 294 /************************************************************** 295 * Memory write to kernel BSS. 296 * 297 * Sandbox mode cannot write to kernel BSS. 298 */ 299 > 300 struct data static_bss; 301 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki