From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C36A6130ADF; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.154.123 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709031909; cv=none; b=Swst7tOP2pbUt09Ph7Kegk1skotXL3e8nmK/g7i8czHY8dEFMztezXPvWV4w33corRnF1jlyXNioLj4/FX/YRNgOCaU40hEpdjL9/DEMst5CJ7EGRUKP+nI94seLnOmS4fBCSG5UGryKf7xdhemmw1VvU8og2gXGzImMVm1YEe0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709031909; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nkEmgcF2sqsTVrDLvW1DSslli5qr0PA0DGExmFUENFo=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gdKmkEVxGKrbo+44kAC+di+AkuQm4HFeVeOFaZwULBEWhkNNbLfrTaLaYoLNaeoY7mOA5uqpMa4GH6xKj7OOW5aseS212vFDxQXDTOm9PT6xzsmsj+f5SJrn4NwchD1hJw4r6FSPDjah7qFUW0nl3A5NujiRRLOyRZEtFYeMLy8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b=kAeNuAsj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.154.123 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b="kAeNuAsj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1709031907; x=1740567907; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=nkEmgcF2sqsTVrDLvW1DSslli5qr0PA0DGExmFUENFo=; b=kAeNuAsjZPcZrxLSW2xXHhiW9q4lVKoBtABPTYFaZq8pVJn4m+uUPG/I BRjWKJalUXetz5phBc2adYGTqvJc/VncHCPFn6f8KoAnxJa3k2dfU6z32 q3Be0IoPRys7MfdcwITd/Yd19x43PedJulUC9HeqbUTvlP/mflJKUAhcs zD3eAoEGpA/Y2M6VaSSDDtvkzn8k92q6/kwyY96N51g1fJM37FEjwEE3J HEyl7q9lqyQMrjARIjHsRkYcuYbdpzRIp8UF4rd+qgj6VfWeTUrvB9DXp 29CxDbot132UQptmp5NhC5xayVVPLsiUPA/tTOm678etVoSoRcs1PhjMN w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hJeSGw/8TAyVRlagmnchCA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: KTDcPATNQk+OtFWm54w0BA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,187,1705388400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="16880169" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa4.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 27 Feb 2024 04:05:06 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 04:04:59 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.85.11) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 04:04:56 -0700 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:04:13 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Miguel Ojeda CC: Conor Dooley , , Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Wedson Almeida Filho , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron , Jonathan Corbet , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Tom Rix , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] scripts: generate_rust_target: enable building on RISC-V Message-ID: <20240227-glove-underwire-f562a56cf2c7@wendy> References: <20240223-leverage-walmart-5424542cd8bd@spud> <20240223-employee-pessimism-03ba0b58db6b@spud> <20240227-resolved-deceit-4a59a6af5b71@wendy> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4yFQMGvLloPM49wl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --4yFQMGvLloPM49wl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:46:42AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:17=E2=80=AFAM Conor Dooley > wrote: > > > > Sure, I'll take a look. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > > Nah, I think that is silly. Either this goes in as-is, and there's > > fixup done by Linus, or the thing should be converted to match arm64, > > assuming that that is possible. >=20 > Ah, so you are going for 6.9 too? I can give the series a try on my > side in that case. When do you plan to apply them? If they're to be applied, it would be Palmer, not I. And if history is any guide, it could be into the merge window. My point though was more that either this was acceptable for v6.9 or would be v6.10 material with the same mechanism as arm64. Rebasing after v6.9-rc1 but not adapting to that way of doing things is what seemed silly to me, since if a resend is required then the other improvements should be carried out at the same time. Cheers, Conor. --4yFQMGvLloPM49wl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZd3BrQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0l+1AQD2Kv7qn0sG5InjsblGeMCFLO+iLg5s4b1JdnY/mXJAMgEAnPLESP1zEN5H BZ6fe0suc1bctDUkHs99G3uQ759MlQc= =9yZw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4yFQMGvLloPM49wl--