Re: [PATCH net-next v6 11/17] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: Add another way of describing several PSE PIs

[Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>]

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:31:06 +0100
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:

> > +          pairsets:
> > +            $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > +            description:
> > +              List of phandles, each pointing to the power supply for the
> > +              corresponding pairset named in 'pairset-names'. This property
> > +              aligns with IEEE 802.3-2022, Section 33.2.3 and 145.2.4.
> > +              PSE Pinout Alternatives (as per IEEE 802.3-2022 Table
> > 145\u20133)
> > +
> > |-----------|---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
> > +              | Conductor | Alternative A | Alternative A | Alternative B
> > | Alternative B |
> > +              |           |    (MDI-X)    |     (MDI)     |      (X)
> > |      (S)      |
> > +
> > |-----------|---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
> > +              | 1         | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE | \u2014
> >     | \u2014             |
> > +              | 2         | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE | \u2014
> >     | \u2014             |
> > +              | 3         | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE | \u2014
> >     | \u2014             |
> > +              | 4         | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> > Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE |
> > +              | 5         | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> > Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE |
> > +              | 6         | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE | \u2014
> >     | \u2014             |
> > +              | 7         | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> > Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE |
> > +              | 8         | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> > Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE |  
> 
> Is it possible to avoid \u encoding? Ideally this documentation should
> be understandable without having to render it using a toolset. I just
> want to use less(1).
> 
> Or is this a email problem? Has something converted your UTF-8 file to
> this \u notation?

It seems to come from the documentation I copied pasted from Oleksij mail.
Will fix it.

Regards,
-- 
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com