Re: [PATCH net-next v4 11/12] microchip: lan865x: add driver support for Microchip's LAN865X MAC-PHY

Parthiban.Veerasooran
2024-04-26T13:32:50Z

Hi Andrew,

On 24/04/24 5:57 am, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
>> +/* OPEN Alliance Configuration Register #0 */
>> +#define OA_TC6_REG_CONFIG0 0x0004
>> +#define CONFIG0_ZARFE_ENABLE BIT(12)
>
> If this is a standard register, you should put these defined where
> other drivers can use them.
OK. Will move it to oa_tc6.c in the next version as you have also
suggested to use this as a helper function in the below comment.
>
>> +static int lan865x_set_mac_address(struct net_device *netdev, void *addr)
>> +{
>> + struct lan865x_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
>> + struct sockaddr *address = addr;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = eth_prepare_mac_addr_change(netdev, addr);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (ether_addr_equal(address->sa_data, netdev->dev_addr))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + ret = lan865x_set_hw_macaddr(priv, address->sa_data);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, address->sa_data);
>
> It seems more normal to call eth_commit_mac_addr_change(), which
> better pairs with eth_prepare_mac_addr_change().
OK, so I will replace eth_hw_addr_set() with
eth_prepare_mac_addr_change() in the next version.
>
>> +static int lan865x_set_zarfe(struct lan865x_priv *priv)
>> +{
>> + u32 regval;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = oa_tc6_read_register(priv->tc6, OA_TC6_REG_CONFIG0, &regval);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Set Zero-Align Receive Frame Enable */
>> + regval |= CONFIG0_ZARFE_ENABLE;
>> +
>> + return oa_tc6_write_register(priv->tc6, OA_TC6_REG_CONFIG0, regval);
>> +}
>
> There does not appear to be anything specific to your device here. So
> please make this a helper in the shared code, so any driver can use
> it.
OK, I will implement this helper function as oa_tc6_enable_zarfe() in
the oa_tc6.c. Also do you want me to move this helper function
implementation to a new patch?

Best regards,
Parthiban V
>
> Andrew
>