From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpu: Re-enable CPU mitigations by default for !X86 architectures
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:34:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240419173429.dj6nzgg3t23f52ol@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZiKgAh1aNBGHpOof@google.com>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 09:46:58AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > It seems confusing to have two config options which have very similar
> > names and similar purposes (with subtle differences depending on the
> > arch).
> >
> > How about we instead just get rid of the x86-specific
> > SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS and replace it with a menu which depends on
> > CPU_MITIGATIONS:
>
> Huh, didn't realize that was possible.
>
> I agree that having two things for the same thing is confusing, though Boris'
> idea to do s/SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS/X86_CPU_MITIGATIONS would help a fair bit
> on that front.
>
> My only hesitation is that x86's menu and the common config knob end up in
> completely different locations.
I'm thinking this is a minor issue because CPU_MITIGATIONS is enabled by
default, so it should almost always be enabled unless the user disables
it, in which case they wouldn't be looking for the x86-specific
mitigations anyway.
Regardless it seems very common for a menu "depends on" to be in a
different file. We could put CPU_MITIGATIONS in arch/Kconfig which is a
fairly logical place for the dependency.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-17 0:15 [PATCH 0/2] cpu: Fix default mitigation behavior Sean Christopherson
2024-04-17 0:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpu: Re-enable CPU mitigations by default for !X86 architectures Sean Christopherson
2024-04-18 0:54 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-04-19 14:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-04-19 14:37 ` Will Deacon
2024-04-19 16:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-04-19 16:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-19 17:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2024-04-19 23:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-19 23:27 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-04-17 0:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpu: Ignore "mitigations" kernel parameter if CPU_MITIGATIONS=n Sean Christopherson
2024-04-19 15:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-04-19 16:01 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240419173429.dj6nzgg3t23f52ol@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox