From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D899181CE8; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714500064; cv=none; b=Jcg+kKjaV7bS1D/SrGWO7xKG55PmqlM9ot0ymKqotVS1XsqHkjSzX3Ka+Tj0+aU7aRBETc20HSo/YnM6tUMLtHZQRLkNy23e61luOY9kC0guD0ovI583xBeJq4F+y0MtGTR/DOOjzyYSi4w5rZJgda0v0yYjY4H81Z2Y+niua9E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714500064; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2SAtvmYEA6DI5uOixBmWe365nJFeU1B9FMxLQgXluxY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AAPobV6iBp64PbWQjlwJ4VSCINhXG+kXLmeqE18gmiyVkdzMPIkI9TH8aRh7mwYEAD16mlTQBG0/pVqX2CmUxsN4JXDy7Lp2cGJThQD8tbzFL5Kf35eX10KFOnQQ/rkaoeYrUs5m8psh1M/EyaZ9mc9NLEMxIITtVWt2P0o39xA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jaGiYMnh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jaGiYMnh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F09EBC4AF17; Tue, 30 Apr 2024 18:01:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1714500063; bh=2SAtvmYEA6DI5uOixBmWe365nJFeU1B9FMxLQgXluxY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jaGiYMnhxBypT44vDoujQqFJ4PAwUjYX2mGSSseoUWfbOfTW96sPKQX93HmbnDicw Bcp5yItbede6FIq8UBYb4wLXE5+tJn3rG1t2gYvIfWmlvNBqcDdMk+2eVKbmwljPn/ PDXfxm989JUh7DNlN4OcsYwdNyQF8ufU3vDTFp/OKEJF5MrzbLFz5izeR7l6lKfcuB NyqZQtXsLLoKiY7xwTeIqPmr9ARwfRULesSEtytLGKYUnB5KTSrjPANQTfVC2iBYWM fJs3TYdfnh+GLx5KkD/sXYFinrU9BdNatqUCI70HLakfHA3uIzsLtmnCwYeqXCoiXf 9QZesBAEtfxNg== Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:01:01 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Danielle Ratson Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "edumazet@google.com" , "pabeni@redhat.com" , "corbet@lwn.net" , "linux@armlinux.org.uk" , "sdf@google.com" , "kory.maincent@bootlin.com" , "maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com" , "vladimir.oltean@nxp.com" , "przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com" , "ahmed.zaki@intel.com" , "richardcochran@gmail.com" , "shayagr@amazon.com" , "paul.greenwalt@intel.com" , "jiri@resnulli.us" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , mlxsw , Petr Machata , Ido Schimmel Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 10/10] ethtool: Veto some operations during firmware flashing process Message-ID: <20240430110101.0ba7d54c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240424133023.4150624-1-danieller@nvidia.com> <20240424133023.4150624-11-danieller@nvidia.com> <20240429202331.29f3dafa@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:48:17 +0000 Danielle Ratson wrote: > Some of this code is only presented in patch 9, so it will cause > splitting some of the vetoes in patch 5 and some of it where the code > around is presented. Does it sound reasonable to you? Yup! Thanks sounds good.