From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>,
"Evan Green" <evan@rivosinc.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
"Charlie Jenkins" <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
"Xiao Wang" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
"Andy Chiu" <andy.chiu@sifive.com>,
"Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@google.com>,
"Greentime Hu" <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Costa Shulyupin" <costa.shul@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>,
"Anup Patel" <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
"Zong Li" <zong.li@sifive.com>,
"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@google.com>,
"Ben Dooks" <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"Erick Archer" <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
"Joel Granados" <j.granados@samsung.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] RISC-V: Check scalar unaligned access on all CPUs
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 09:22:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240614-padded-mammal-d956735c1293@wendy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240613191616.2101821-4-jesse@rivosinc.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4094 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 03:16:12PM -0400, Jesse Taube wrote:
> Originally, the check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus function
> only checked the boot hart. This fixes the function to check all
> harts.
This seems like it should be split out and get a Fixes: tag & a cc:
stable.
> Check for Zicclsm before checking for unaligned access. This will
> greatly reduce the boot up time as finding the access speed is no longer
> necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> V1 -> V2:
> - New patch
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 23 ++++++----------------
> arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> index b62d5a2f4541..8fadbe00dd62 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> @@ -526,31 +526,17 @@ int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static bool check_unaligned_access_emulated(int cpu)
> +static void check_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *unused)
> {
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> long *mas_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(&misaligned_access_speed, cpu);
> unsigned long tmp_var, tmp_val;
> - bool misaligned_emu_detected;
>
> *mas_ptr = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
>
> __asm__ __volatile__ (
> " "REG_L" %[tmp], 1(%[ptr])\n"
> : [tmp] "=r" (tmp_val) : [ptr] "r" (&tmp_var) : "memory");
> -
> - misaligned_emu_detected = (*mas_ptr == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED);
> - /*
> - * If unaligned_ctl is already set, this means that we detected that all
> - * CPUS uses emulated misaligned access at boot time. If that changed
> - * when hotplugging the new cpu, this is something we don't handle.
> - */
> - if (unlikely(unaligned_ctl && !misaligned_emu_detected)) {
> - pr_crit("CPU misaligned accesses non homogeneous (expected all emulated)\n");
> - while (true)
> - cpu_relax();
> - }
> -
> - return misaligned_emu_detected;
> }
>
> bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
> @@ -562,8 +548,11 @@ bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
> * accesses emulated since tasks requesting such control can run on any
> * CPU.
> */
> + schedule_on_each_cpu(check_unaligned_access_emulated);
> +
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> - if (!check_unaligned_access_emulated(cpu))
> + if (per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu)
> + != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED)
> return false;
>
> unaligned_ctl = true;
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
> index a9a6bcb02acf..70c1588fc353 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
> @@ -259,23 +259,28 @@ static int check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
> kfree(bufs);
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */
>
> static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
> {
> - bool all_cpus_emulated = check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus();
> + bool all_cpus_emulated;
> + int cpu;
>
> + if (riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICCLSM)) {
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_FAST;
> + }
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + all_cpus_emulated = check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus();
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
Can we make this an IS_ENABLED() please?
Thanks,
Conor.
> if (!all_cpus_emulated)
> return check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus();
> +#endif
>
> return 0;
> }
> -#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */
> -static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
> -{
> - check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus();
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
>
> arch_initcall(check_unaligned_access_all_cpus);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-14 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-13 19:16 [PATCH v2 0/6] RISC-V: Detect and report speed of unaligned vector accesses Jesse Taube
2024-06-13 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] RISC-V: Add Zicclsm to cpufeature and hwprobe Jesse Taube
2024-06-14 8:09 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-17 3:18 ` Andy Chiu
2024-06-13 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: riscv: Add Zicclsm ISA extension description Jesse Taube
2024-06-14 8:06 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-13 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] RISC-V: Check scalar unaligned access on all CPUs Jesse Taube
2024-06-14 8:22 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2024-06-17 23:56 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-06-13 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] RISC-V: Detect unaligned vector accesses supported Jesse Taube
2024-06-14 8:36 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-14 8:40 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-14 14:28 ` Jesse Taube
2024-06-14 14:32 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-17 16:39 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-06-18 1:43 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-06-18 2:09 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-06-20 21:31 ` Jesse Taube
2024-06-20 22:14 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-06-20 23:08 ` Jesse Taube
2024-06-21 10:06 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-21 17:18 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-06-21 17:58 ` Eric Biggers
2024-06-21 18:02 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-21 18:07 ` Jesse Taube
2024-06-22 11:42 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-20 18:51 ` Evan Green
2024-06-24 5:34 ` Andy Chiu
2024-06-24 16:57 ` Evan Green
2024-06-13 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] RISC-V: Report vector unaligned access speed hwprobe Jesse Taube
2024-06-20 18:51 ` Evan Green
2024-06-13 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] RISC-V: hwprobe: Document unaligned vector perf key Jesse Taube
2024-06-20 18:51 ` Evan Green
2024-06-21 18:30 ` Jesse Taube
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240614-padded-mammal-d956735c1293@wendy \
--to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=andy.chiu@sifive.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=costa.shul@redhat.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=erick.archer@gmx.com \
--cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
--cc=jesse@rivosinc.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox